Skip to Content

Gadling's resident pilot explains what life in the cockpit is like

Recent Comments:

Spy Shots: Honda's hybrid Prius-fighter caught {Autoblog}

Jul 17th 2008 3:37PM Yeah but it's all duct-taped up like a 3-year old Ford!

We're telling you for the last time, ethanol is not biodiesel {Autoblog Green}

May 9th 2008 2:56PM David Wright: "I venture to suggest that half the population of the USA (which is where so many EV-skeptics reside) will be driving electric vehicles themselves in ten years."

There is no possibility whatsoever of that happening, not even close. Factors you've got to consider are installed base, rate of new car manufacture and purchase, rate of old car scrapping, and the very long development and lead times of mass producing new vehicles.

There are now some 220 - 230 million ICE cars in the U.S., a number increasing several million per year as new car sales are larger than numbers scrapped.

Current sales of EVs in 2008 = close enough to round down to zero. How do you expect EVs to have placed 120 or 130 million vehicles in the fleet by 2018? No chance. It'll take that decade for manufacturing to ramp up, and US sales of EVs to even pass -- what, 1 million? 2 million? -- per year, pretty much the best possible scenario.

Far more likely than your expectation, is that in 2018 new ICE cars will still be outselling new EV cars by 10:1 -- that's all assuming things actually progress sufficiently with EV battery tech, which remains to be seem.

Lutz talks EV1 and Volt with the Detroit News; first lithium Volt now running! {Autoblog Green}

Apr 25th 2008 4:29PM "78% of us drive less than 40 miles each day.
85% less than 50 miles"

So what, why even quote stuff like this, do you think the rest of us don't know that we don't drive 500 miles every day? I drive less than 40 miles MOST days too. But sometimes I need to travel 200 miles and sometimes I need to travel 500 miles, and every once in awhile I need to travel 1200 miles. Those occasional long-distance needs make an electric car totally and completely useless.

Because that's why I own a car. So that I can independently travel further than walking distance when I need to. Sometimes that means a 450 mile trip.

It's one thing to claim to be "interested" in an EV1, and quite another to be interested enough to slap down $30,000 to buy an EV1, which obviously very few people wanted to do.

The Prius may not be the best way to cut energy costs {Autoblog Green}

Apr 23rd 2008 1:24PM You mean that I can save money by not buying a $20,000 car if I can tolerate limiting myself to bus routes?

You mean if I seldom drive I might not want to spend an additional $10,000 on a too-fancy car?

Wow, thank God there are hardworking journalists unlocking these inscrutable mysteries for us rubes. Slow news day I guess

Satellite radio: Looking for a few good customers, anybody? {Autoblog}

Jan 28th 2008 11:06AM "Unless you have a compelling need to hear Howard Stern unfiltered, most of the rest doesn't sound much different than what you can hear on terrestrial radio."

C'mon, I COULD heap abuse on you for such a dumb statement -- you're one of those people who don't get out of the big city much, aren't you? Try driving through southeast Oklahoma and see what you can find on the radio. Between the talk, sports & music, satellite radio is vastly different and has tons of stuff unavailable in the AM/FM band in any city in the country. And BTW I never listen to Howard Stern -- personally I spend more time listening to the CNBC audio track than anything else, which you can't get on terrestrial radio.

Since you couldn't be bothered to look it up I'll mention that sat radio has by now well over 16 million paying subscribers who appear to disagree with you. Standalone tuners have never been the primary focus of their sales effort, and if those are falling now it might be because 8 or 10 million new cars are now sold each year with integrated tuners (nearly all GM vehicles, for example).

OLPC's XO gets previewed in its "final" form {Engadget}

Sep 19th 2007 12:13PM What a boon to parents, who'll now be able to say:
"Quit whining Junior. Starving children in Mongolia have to use BLACK AND WHITE computer screens to look at porn."

More on Google's RechargeIT: Plug in hybrids and the smart grid {Autoblog Green}

Jun 20th 2007 2:43PM *** If the driver miscalculates and ends up driving beyond the remaining "eletric" range, the car goes into "charge sustaining" mode. The gas engine does not recharge the battery completely, so no "gasoline generated energy" would end up going to the grid. ***

You are wrong, Chris. As you acknowledge, a driver who has miscalculated (and who's going to guarantee that no one will ever miscalculate or have a change in evening plans?) will now burn some gasoline on the way home. So instead of a pure-electric commute, gasoline is thus being consumed that otherwise would not have been, as a direct result of the driver having sold electricity from his battery earlier in the day.

It does not matter that the car is in "charge sustaining mode" or that the battery is not fully recharged. Those details are distractors. The car is burning gasoline because and only because it had traded away battery power to the grid.

Yes this means gasoline is being burned in order to supply the grid with electricity: grid electricity is generated by gasoline. This is quite clear.

This is not a difficult concept. I don't understand why people have trouble grasping it.

More on Google's RechargeIT: Plug in hybrids and the smart grid {Autoblog Green}

Jun 19th 2007 5:52PM I think this car-to-grid thing is brilliant. For the utility. If they announced they were installing massive gasoline engines to create gasoline-generated electricity, people might protest. But you have the local population foot the bill for the capital expense of the batteries, and let them create the gasoline-generated electricity FOR you, and suddenly it's GREEN.

Happily there's not a reporter out there who can put 2 and 2 together and realize that when your car battery is drained by the utility, and you then have run your evening commute and errands on gas instead of battery, then you have created gasoline-generated electricity without anyone even noticing! Yippee!

The Story You Didn't Read: Mexico's tortilla riots {BloggingStocks}

Feb 11th 2007 10:00PM "Underclass of America is used to being hungry"? That a joke? The underclass of America has a very high rate of obesity. The underclass of America is used to stuffing themselves. Why ruin an interesting article with this brainless sophomoric J-school throwaway line?

Bush thinks Defense Department is 1,259 times more important than greener cars {Autoblog Green}

Feb 9th 2007 4:15PM Sebastian, despite your astonishingly poor judgment in wanting to needlessly piss off half of your potential readership, I'll resist the temptation to give you the verbal beating you deserve and calmly point out a few simple things that you seem somehow to have overlooked.

- The Federal Government has an absolute constitutional mandate to maintain a standing military and provide for national defense. There is no such constitutional mandate to invest in energy research at all. It's rather "liberal" therefore to spend so much as a single dollar on such items.

- It is possible for the Feds to spend $500 billion on defense. However it would be completely impossible for them to spend anywhere near that that much on energy research. The limitation is in actual real, live, trained and educated humans and the resources they would use. There are only so many electrical engineers, corn engineers (whatever), appropriately trained technicians and college perfessors, who are not already being paid to work on these issues. If you're in that line of work it's already Fat City for you as it is, where do you think another $500 billion will go?

- There is already a thriving and fast growing market in the private sector of people doing all this research ALREADY in hopes of making money. I'm surprised no one told you. This is the target of massive funding, venture capitalists pouring in money, IPOs, etc. There is a fortune to be gained by someone who can make an electric car that is actually useful, for example, and you will apparently be shocked to learn that that motivates people.

I'm sure that this is all new to you, so perhaps you should print this off and have some smart person read it to you, slowly, every couple of days. Be persistent, use crayons, it might sink in.

Profile

  • Supercat
  • Member Since Dec 28th, 2005

Are you Supercat? If So, Login Here.

Activity

Autoblog
43 Comments
Gadling
2 Comments
Engadget
21 Comments
Droxy (Digital Radio)
3 Comments
The Wireless Report
1 Comment
BloggingStocks
1 Comment
Autoblog Green
96 Comments