AutoblogGreen

20 miles range... there is no point in this vehicle for me. I need at least 40 to even consider an EV. I want 100. Come on MiEV!

GM should be shooting for 60, 80 -plus options. 20 is a joke.

Reply

16 KWHr for 40 miles of range is 400 watt hours per mile. That is just about double what the Tesla roadster uses. The Tesla roadster has ~50 KWHr for 200 miles.

$10K for 16KWHr is $625 per KWHr. Battery costs are falling. The commonly quoted price prior to this was $1K per KWHr.

Reply

Just how you can order a LS LT or a LTZ for a malibu they should offer the same with a volt,
Let you wallet dictate how much ev range you want.
Pretty much there is no real added cost to offering this selection.
It will be the same as ordering climate control or regular ac, Leather or cloth, Auto or manual in other cars.

if 40 miles of range covers 80% of all drivers
what twill 20 miles a day cover?
I drove 6,000 miles last year half of that was commuting to work the other half was shopping and driving to my family in maine,
Yeah i have a smaller commute than most people because i am not retarded.

I picked a job that paid slightly less than another offer because i didn't have to drive 30 miles to work each way. To me i took my salary, divided by hours of day i spent from home, that included the commute. The extra 30 hours a month i would of been sitting in traffic wasn't worth it to me
Now that gas has gone up 33% in the past year i feel even better
thats another 160 dollars a month i am saving by driving less.

Reply

In other words the engine/generator will be running constantly to supply the current to the batteries. This will probably reduce the mpg to the level of the gen 3 Prius. While the Prius 3 will be much cheaper. Toyota is looking like the wise zen master here. When they get their Lithium chemistry right they will integrate it into Prius 4 or go all electric if the prices of the batteries drop. Lets not leave out Honda which will have an even smaller/cheaper hybrid.

Reply

* 16 KWHr for 40 miles of range is 400 watt hours per mile. *

The Volt only uses half its battery capacity (8 KWh) as it stands today, operating without the IC engine between 30% and 80% charge to achieve the 40 mile figure.

Reply

I've been skeptical of the GM Volt initiative all along. The car looks big and heavy with wide tires and we all know that batteries have limited energy storage capacity and they are heavy for what they store.

My guess is that GM is finding it hard to hit the 40 mile promise and keep the cost low.

The thing that GM has working in its favor is volume and the ability to get a really good price on the batteries.

This will be very interesting to watch.

Reply

It's all part of the reason why an hypercar concept, and especially an all-EV hypercar concept is so attractive with current battery pricing and technology (in an EV, you put less stress on the batteries than you do in a PHEV so you don't have to use draconian measures like installing twice as much battery capacity as you plan to use). While you may spend more for ultralight materials and streamlining, you save more than that in the cost of the battery pack. At the same time, it lowers maintenance, improves performance, and reduces charge time and lets you charge from weaker power sources.

Reply

me2 thats the concept. The volt doesn't look much like the concept and wont have tires like the concept either.

The batteries they are using are not that heavy
the volt is using a 50 amp hour pack
around 400lbs thats nothing compared to the weight of lead acid to get that power it would weigh 1200lbs

Reply

===========================================================
16 KWHr for 40 miles of range is 400 watt hours per mile. *

The Volt only uses half its battery capacity (8 KWh) as it stands today, operating without the IC engine between 30% and 80% charge to achieve the 40 mile figure.
===========================================================

So a 16KWHr battery pack would have 8 KWHrs os usable energy. 8 KWHrs / 40 miles = 200 watt hours per mile. That is about what the Tesla roadster uses. This car might acheive that at low speeds with lots of regeneration when stopping, but I doubt it. Its way larger than a Tesla roadster.

200 watt hours per mile x 60 MPH = 12 KW = 16HP. Do you think that car will go 60 MPH on only 16 HP ?

Reply

"The batteries they are using are not that heavy
the volt is using a 50 amp hour pack
around 400lbs thats nothing compared to the weight of lead acid to get that power it would weigh 1200lbs"

Who said anything about lead-acid? The Volt is a car that gets ~50mpg in charge-sustaining mode. That's pretty far from the hypercar concept. The hypercar concept is about extreme streamlining, light weight from things like a composite skin and lightweight alloys, etc. This costs more, but the cost is recouped in reduced battery costs, and you gain all of the associated benefits.

The Aptera is an implementation of the hypercar concept, with the Mk1 pre-production prototype getting 130mpg on gasoline and the lighter Mk0 testing prototype getting 230 mpg in a CVT diesel. Even with a more conventional car design than the Aptera, however, I'm sure you could get at least 100mpg. That means half the battery pack size, double the recharge rate, half the battery maintenance costs, and so on compared to a car with the efficiency of the Volt. But that's only half of the Volt's problem; the other half is that they're only using half of their pack because it's a small-pack PHEV. In a 100-mpg charge-sustaining hypercar concept, you could 4x the range with a pack that weighs the same amount without sacrificing pack longevity since you'd be stressing the pack a lot less.

Reply

LOL. Leave it to GM to figure out how to get bad mileage on electricity as well... They really need a small and light vehicle initially that uses less of the most expensive component (the battery), until costs can be brought down to where it can be affordable by the majority.

Reply

@me2
I don't see the issue, it's using direct drive and the range testing on the Tesla was using the less efficient 2-speed. If worst comes to worst, they can open the taps a little with their battery reserve and get the 40 miles for sure. That's not the problem though, the problem is the batteries are still very expensive. This is just offering another less expensive option for people who don't mind the lesser range.

@meme
A mainstream manufacturer like GM isn't going to be much concerned about building things like hypercars; we are lucky to get some of the smaller cars from Europe here in the US, much less a hypercar. I'll be happy if they finish this car and actually make an effort to sell it, I'm not hoping for much from GM.

Reply

"The batteries they are using are not that heavy the volt is using a 50 amp hour pack
around 400lbs thats nothing compared to the weight of lead acid to get that power it would weigh 1200lbs"

Please don't quote battery power as amp hours and not mention the voltage. Ideally battery packs should be rated in KWhrs.

Reply

Imagine a 40 mile range series hybrid.
Cost: $34,000

Now imagine the same car with half the range:
Cost: $29,000

Brings the payments down a bit, and now more people can afford the car. plus they can technically sell twice the number of cars for the same amount of batteries.

Sounds like a supply side issue...

Reply

the chevy volt battery pack should be 300V thats the range for most AC production cars

Reply

20 miles would cover close to 50% of the average daily driving:

http://www.a123systems.com/#/applications/phev/pchart6/

Would be more then 50% if you could charge at work, as i can f.e. So a 20 mile options seems like a really good decision to me. And another thing, can someone please explain to me why a PHEV would put a lot more strain on the battery then a HEV ?

AFAIK, the reason for using only 50% of the batterycapacity in the Volt is because the expect to get 10+ years life out of it while keeping the 40 mile range on electricity. Tesla on the other hand expects to get ~5 year with full capacity so i wouldn't compare the Tesla Roadster to the Chevy Volt directly.

Reply

@Laban
"And another thing, can someone please explain to me why a PHEV would put a lot more strain on the battery then a HEV ? "
People generally say a PHEV puts more strain on a battery than a BEV, not more than a HEV. I would imagine an HEV puts more strain on a battery than a PHEV (at least in terms of charge cycles) b/c the HEV battery is constantly recharged while the PHEV battery is larger and will likely see less charge cycles over its lifetime.

However there is a point that hybrids today are basically all parallel hybrids and it might not use its battery as much as a PHEV does, b/c it can run directly on the gasoline motor too (this is esp true for hybrids when on the highway). In a PHEV, the person is most likely going to use the EV side more often, even on the highway, so they might end up using the battery more in terms of miles traveled on battery, if not in terms of charge cycles.

Reply

@Jake: Sorry, i meant BEV compared to PHEV, the question was related to:

Meme: "in an EV, you put less stress on the batteries than you do in a PHEV so you don't have to use draconian measures like installing twice as much battery capacity as you plan to use"

Reply

I wasnt going to buy one anyway. Full EV (iMiev) for me.

Reply