AutoblogGreen

Fuel economy depends on so many factors besides the vehicle itself. An average of 29 is not bad, but I bet I could average over 30 with that vehicle and my driving style. (I'm not an impractical hypermiler either). With my 3,300 lb 2006 Saab 9-3 SportCombi 2.0 T (210 hp) manual, I average 28 mpg and with my former 2004 Saab 9-3 2.0 t (175 hp) automatic sedan, I averaged 28.5 mpg. These were both at about 60% highway / 40% city. Needless to say, I'm a big believer in turbos and I look forward to the 1.4 L turbo version of the Astra. (As another point of reference, with my non-turbo 1997 Saab 900 2.3 automatic which was rated at 19/27 with the old rating system, I have averaged 26.5 mpg over 11 years).

Reply

Of course the price of Premium is over $.30-$.40 over 87 here now--so I would have to think about getting a turbo. The Premium..um..Premium stopped me from getting a Mazda CX-7.

Reply

Canadian gas typically contains no ethanol and thus they get better fuel economy. The E10 common in the US contains 4% less energy than straight gas.

Reply

Fuel Economy depends upon another "factor", controlling the public perception of what's available and what can be accomplished. Building this car with a guzzler 4 cylinder engine helps stop the slid OUT of SUV's. "Gosh, it doesn't get much better gas mileage then my SUV".

The auto industry IS a subsidiary of the oil industry.
We need FEDERAL LAWS to FORCE these jerks to build cars for a Better American, not a Bigger Bottom Line to Exxon.

Reply

Mike Z,

The notion that all turbos require premium is a common misconception. I do pay more for premium on my current car, (210 hp version). On the 175 hp version of the Saab/GM engine, regular grade gas is the recommended minimum octane. Unfortunately, they no longer sell that version in the U.S.

I'm assuming that the Astra 1.4 L turbo would be designed to accommodate regular gas due to its market segment.

Reply

@ whynot...

"Canadian gas typically contains no ethanol and thus they get better fuel economy."

FYI, Ontario has a 5% ethanol content mandate. Canadian Driver story was filed in Ottawa, Ontario.

Reply

metrompg.com:
Fair enough. I guess I was speaking more of Western Canada. But that's still a 2% difference in energy. And we're only talking about a 5% difference in mpg anyway.

As to the idea this will drive people back into SUVs, this is still a lot better mpg than even a RAV4 gets in similar conditions.

Reply

One year ago, these cars were all over Italy. They look great, and judging by the numbers, people like 'em. Even with European gas prices. I know they have less thirsty engines, but Saturn would be stupid not to bring some of those engine options here. Well, I guess we will have to see about that...
GBG
www.autoclay.blogspot.com

Reply

I have a 2005 9-3 Linear that runs fine on regular. I avg 32 mpg in mixed driving. Approximately 20% of my driving is in city traffic. My car is a 5 speed, and I am sure I could get over 30 mpg with a 5 speed Astra. The car is slightly under powered with only 140hp, but it rides and handles very well. It drives like what it is, a good small European car.

Reply

@GBG pretty sure that over 70% of those Astra's you saw where Diesels.

Reply

I've Opel Astra 1.4L 1995 and it gets 1L to 13 km, about 31MPG (US).

Reply

ok, so the Saturn division brands itself now as the company that "rethinks" what an automobile should be... yet, 15 years ago, they sold steel and alloy framed cars with lightweight ABS panels that still today, after wear and tear achieve 38 to 40 mpg as owners continue to report.

Excellent way to RETHINK...

Reply

@12: Something about the fact the people are no longer interested in buying the product would make any company rethink things.

Reply