AutoblogGreen

I think it will be more efficient and cheap by using internal combustion engines instead of fuelcells.

Reply

You are quite right, London keeps itself busy by being in the middle of some or the other environmental news (mostly in a good way) first by way of the London entry tax and then the hydrogen buses. More cities should look to implement these initiatives to lower pollution and congestion on the roads. - http://www.zapworld.com

Reply

You are quite right, London keeps itself busy by being in the middle of some or the other environmental news (mostly in a good way) first by way of the London entry tax and then the hydrogen buses. More cities should look to implement these initiatives to lower pollution and congestion on the roads. - http://www.zapworld.com

Reply

It would be more efficient and cheap to run IC engines directly on compressed natural gas, especially since the cheapest source of H2 is steam reformed natural gas, and that is what Air Products will use.

fuel cells are far more expensive than IC engines, but would appear to be more efficient. However, when you subtract the energy losses in steam reformation to make H2 fuel, the combination of H2 production and fuel cell vehicle uses about as much natural gas as a compressed natural gas vehicle would. So, why waste so much money for no real advantage?

Of course, the H2 ICE vehicles will use far more natural gas than a compressed natural gas would, and produce far more carbon emissions.

So this whole H2 bus project is a rather expensive step backwards, all in the name of "progress".

Politicians for the most part don't seem to understand that. Many have been snookered by the hydrogen hype, and most are rather careless with government funds. It doesn't help that most of the public is similarly uninformed, and too often fail to hold officials responsible for bad decisions.

Reply

Aw, Chris... Hydrogen is the PERFECT fuel... for people who can freely spend other people's money.

Reply

Somebody already found the answers the hard way. Read this:

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8365544?nclick_check=1

Reply

Hydrogen is not a perfect fuel by a longs hot . I think to truly make it efficent is to only use ut to generate electricity essentially acting as a range extender for electric automobiles (grant it that the automobile gets over 300 miles on a single charge),. Personally t would take the route of a fuel cell vehicle than burning the hydrogen because you still create emission by burning a gas. Yes the process to make hydrogen is dirty ( in a senss because the power used comes from a coal fired plant) But it can become green by using renewable energy .

Reply

Hydrogen as an energy carrier (like petrol or diesel) is very inefficient overall. See:

http://planetforlife.com/h2/h2swiss.html

if you don't believe me.

It is only attractive because it seems so lovely - the only by-product is water. However, here is another scheme, not so sexy, but a whole lot more practical -

www.nanobus.org

using rapid charging NanoSafe or A123 battery packs on diesel-electric hybrids, and opportunity charging at the ends of the bus route whenever possible. In this scheme, you can get anywhere from 10-90% full electric running, depending on how much you charge, but still can switch on the generator into hybrid mode if you are stuck in traffic, or need to turn on the A/C.

Note: I wrote this website, so I am sort of biased...

Reply

Is this London England, or London Ontario we are talking about here?

Reply