First Drive: 2009 Honda FCX Clarity, world's first series production fuel cell car
Filed under: Hydrogen, Honda, AutoblogGreen Exclusive, LA Auto Show

Click on the FCX Clarity for a high-res gallery
What you see pictured above is the world's first fuel cell-powered car designed from the ground up expressly for that purpose with series production in mind. It's not converted from any existing vehicle like the Chevy Equinox, Toyota Highland and Ford Focus that you can find elsewhere on this site. The Honda FCX Clarity takes the layout and design themes first seen in two years ago in the FCX concept to completion. As we reported earlier this week, the FCX Clarity will be available for lease to retail customers beginning in the summer of 2008.
In the days following the world premiere of the FCX Clarity at the LA Auto Show, Honda invited a select group of journalists to drive a pair of pre-production examples in Santa Monica. As pre-production samples, these two cars are essentially hand built but using production tooling. Some reports have the value of these cars as much as $10,000,000 which may or may not be accurate for the current stage of development, but read on after the break to find out what happens when bloggers take to the PCH and Malibu Canyon in Honda's latest creations.
All photos ©2007 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.

Before we got to hop into the cars, some of the chief engineers and designers on the FCX program gave us a briefing on technical and design details. The soft-spoken VP of Honda of America R&D, Ben Knight, started things off with some background on the company's efforts in developing more efficient, less polluting technologies such as the CVCC engines of the 1970s and the EV-Plus battery electric of the late '90s and on to the fuel cell and diesel power-trains under development today. Knight may be soft-spoken, but like GM's Larry Burns, he is very much a hands-on engineer with a passion for developing new technology.
While facilities for retail distribution of hydrogen are obviously extremely limited right now, Honda is actively working to change that too. Honda Soltec recently started production of new photo-voltaic cells that only require half the energy input to manufacture of current cells. Their Torrance, CA headquarters campus has a hydrogen filling station that features two different H2 generators. A solar powered electrolyzer produces the gas from water, while the experimental Home Energy Station has a natural gas reformer.

With the most common way of producing hydrogen right new is steam reformation of natural gas, CO2 emissions still remain a concern. However, when well-to-wheels CO2 emissions are evaluated in comparison to gasoline engines, steam reformation and fuel cells show a sixty percent reduction. For solar powered electrolysis, Honda has proton exchange membrane electrolyzer that basically functions as a fuel cell in reverse and is eighty percent efficient. Although home hydrogen generation is still a ways off, centrally produced hydrogen is being distributed via pipelines right now. Shell will open be opening a hydrogen station in Los Angeles next year right on an existing 8" hydrogen pipeline.
Exterior Design Leader Masaru Hosagawa explained that the body of the new FCX was specifically designed to highlight the tiny drive-train that propels this relatively large car. The FCX takes the cab forward design ethos to a whole new level with the base of the windshield starting at about the front wheel center line and sweeping all the way back to the edge of the trunk lid in a continuous curve dubbed Dynamic Full Cabin Design. Combined with the super compact vertical flow fuel cell stack that sits within the center console, the FCX has an almost limousine-like interior volume for four passengers. 
Speaking of the passengers, keeping them in climate-controlled comfort is important but regulating the temperature of such a large interior volume can consume quite a bit of energy. One way to minimize that energy is to regulate the temperature right at the surface of the occupants. Since the largest point of contact between the passengers and the car is the seats, Honda has chosen to provide a climate control system within the seats. Fans draw air into the front seats where a thermo-electric device chills or heats it before blowing it through pores in the seat cushions. The end result is greatly reduced demand on the climate control system.
The FCX Clarity has remained remarkably true to the concept with the most obvious visual difference being the nose. The production car has been stretched out by a few inches in order to provide crush space for crash protection. The grille has now been moved above a new chrome bumper strip taking the place of the previous full-width light bar. In profile the base of the windshield extended even farther forward and the front quarter windows were part of the body. Those windows are now smaller and integrated into the doors instead. At the back, the full width tail-lamp cluster is now slimmer in the middle providing room for an extra piece of vertical glass aiding rear visibility with the high deck. That tall deck combines with a fuel tank mounted down low between the rear wheels to provide for much more trunk room than other converted fuel cell cars. Including the under floor compartment, the total storage volume is 13.1 cu. ft. The fully-appointed FCX is equipped with all the modern conveniences such as a satellite navigation system, adaptive cruise control, electronic stability control. All of this is combined in an aluminum structural cage that provides protection for the passengers and the fuel system.

Chief Engineer Sachito Fujimoto described the FCX platform as having been designed to be lightweight while providing maximum safety. The FCX is designed to meet and surpass all safety standards in the US and elsewhere. When this car becomes available next year, it won't require any safety waivers. The 5,000 psi hydrogen tank is designed to withstand any impact it might see in the real world. While the first generation FCX used a two tank storage system, the new car has switched to a single-tank setup. Previously separate components like the pressure sensor, regulator and shut-off valve are now combined in one module mounted in the tank.

Having only one tank means fewer connection points that can fail so that safety is enhanced and installation is a lot simpler. A single larger diameter tank has greater capacity in less overall space than two smaller tanks. The bottom line is seventy-four percent fewer parts and twenty-four percent better storage efficiency.
One problematic aspect of many previous fuel cell vehicles has been high weight. The Chevrolet Equinox Fuel Cell being used for that company's Project Driveway weighs over 4,400 pounds and the Sequel concept reportedly weighs over 5,000 lbs. Even the much smaller Ford Focus FCV weighs in at 3,600 lbs. The new FCX Clarity weighs in at 3,582 lbs, which is only about 175 lbs more than the similarly-sized 2008 Accord. Doing a ground up design around a fuel cell power-train has allowed Honda to optimize it for the purpose.
That pays off in the ride and handling of the Clarity. While some other cross-over type fuel cell vehicles definitely feel more truck like on the road, this car is pure Honda. Jonny Lieberman and I set out from the Fairmont Hotel in Santa Monica in one of the two FCXs and headed west on the Pacific Coast Highway toward Malibu. In a region heavily populated with Ferraris, Porsches, Aston Martins, Rolls Royces and Bentleys, the futuristic looking FCX seemed to draw remarkably little attention from other occupants of the PCH (continue reading to find out what it feels like to drive the FCX).












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
11-18-2007 @ 8:35PM
why not the LS2LS7? said...
Kudos for using "The PCH" again after the ridiculous blow up last time.
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 2:17AM
Joseph said...
"in an aluminum structural cage"
The Clarity isn't all aluminium, aluminium was only used for certain parts of the car.
Other than that, great writeup. I'm amazed how low they kept the weight. Only Honda could've done that. ;) lol
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 2:56AM
Turbofrog said...
I'm impressed with everything except that estimated price tag. Considering Honda said a while back that $85,000 was the magic number for commercial adoption of fuel cells, if they even manage to bring it down to that price I'm worried about the real potential, when the potential for practical BEVs (i.e. the $50,000 Whitestar) is already there.
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 8:18AM
BlackbirdHighway said...
The commercial price for hydrogen right now is about $8 a kilo. Did you have any estimates from Honda about what it will cost in the future to buy it at one the new stations, or what it will cost to make your own, either from electricity or from natural gas?
This car looks great, but I'm still not really sold on hydrogen. I think I'd like to use the new Honda PV solar panels to charge my Tesla.
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 8:21AM
Sam Abuelsamid said...
I was told by Honda that retail stations in California are selling H2 for $5/kg
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 9:18AM
kert said...
why the hell are they messing around with sedans, if 18-wheeler trucks would be way more appropriate use for hydrogen ?
you wont really build a BEV 18-wheeler any time soon, and given truck sizes and prices hydrogen makes way more sense to hide in there.
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 10:19AM
CJ said...
I think it looks amazing. The silver front fender looks a bit Jetta-esque. I like the potential for these vehicles (should the technology cost decrease substantially). Renewable energy sources being utilized for hydrogen are awesome, considering the possibilities in the future with cheaper solar panels, etc. BEVs are also a coming technology that could shake the foundations of the possible hydrogen market. A BEV would wonderful for around the town use (considering, once more, if costs come down substantially). A lot of people question why hydrogen should even be considered, but a fuel that would allow for long-distance travel is necessary. Parking and recharging your car on a roadtrip for 20 minutes (like some coming vehicles propose) wouldn't be fun. I usually pull off, fill up, and get back on the road in a matter of minutes.
The future's going to be defined by a plethora of fuel types. I honestly do not believe that there will be any specific winner for some time to come. Consumers are going to be sold on different technologies, which is fine. As long as they don't hurt the environment any more than current techs, then we'll all be good.
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 10:59AM
Jim said...
No one ever mentions the range. How far do you go for $5 worth H2
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 11:00AM
pkuhl said...
http://www.efcf.com/reports/E17.pdf
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 12:05PM
Jason said...
Here's a clue: stop making ugly body styles. Why is this so hard to understand? People dont want to buy a car that looks like the Prius. Why cant you put (and Im exaggerating) a Porsche body on these vehicles? Make an attractive body and more people will buy them. Its almost as if companies dont want people to buy these cars by purposefully putting unattractive styles on them.
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 3:09PM
AlienFarmer said...
I miss the EV1's... What I like most about electric cars is you can plug them in at your own home at night. Why do we need H2 when we can use solar panels on own homes to power electric cars with a 300 mile radius? With thin film solar panels heck we could even use solar panels on the electric cars as well.
AlienFarmer
http://www.SolarCoupons.com
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 4:34PM
Wayne said...
Bad idea.
We already have technology that allows us to make hydrogen directly from water - in the vehicle, as needed - with no need to store the hydrogen at all.
Ooops - my oversight - such a car would eliminate our need for Shell in the whole equation.
Reply
11-20-2007 @ 2:38AM
Chris M said...
Wayne, which "hydrogen direct from water in the vehicle as needed" process are you referring to? There are several, each with serious drawbacks:
First is fuel reforming, that is, reacting a hydrocarbon fuel with water (steam, actually) to get CO2 and H2. It works with readily available fuels, but the process suffers from energy losses that make it only a bit more efficient than conventional engines, and the reforming device is expensive and difficult to operate. GM dropped work on that idea for just those reasons.
Next is reacting a metal with water to form a metal oxide and H2. Several metals will work - magnesium, calcium metal, aluminum, iron, etc. The problem here is the large weight of metal needed, the high cost of the metal, the energy used to refine and recycle the metal, and the fact that these metals could be more efficiently used in a cheaper metal/air battery.
Or maybe you are referring to one of those electrolyzer gizmos being hawked on youtube videos. Sorry, but it just doesn't work the way they claim. It doesn't matter what kind of voltage or pulse frequency or electrode spacing is used, the electrical energy produced by a fuel cell is far less than the electrical energy consumed by the electrolyzer to produce the H2 for the fuel cell. In fact, you loose about 70% of the energy in the process, possibly more for a poorly constructed homebrew electrolyzer. As for Stanley Meyer, he was just a good ole country scammer.
Reply
11-20-2007 @ 4:29PM
Ernie said...
"Here's a clue: stop making ugly body styles. Why is this so hard to understand?"
*Sigh*
I don't get it. It looks smooth and aerodynamic to me. And that's because.... it *is* smooth and aerodynamic. That's why they built it this way.
Perhaps what you meant to say is "they could make it look like the Ford Probe"? Whose body styling is pretty aerodynamic. Once upon a time they intended it to be the most aerodynamic car in production, after all. But that kind of got watered down and they ended up with something else.
And then there's your definition of "ugly". Ugly, like perhaps, a Honda Civic? Or a Toyota Corolla? Or a Mazda 3? These cars all look remarkably the same, and oh look, they're the top-selling cars in Canada! (ref: http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jc/compact2.htm) Just because you don't masturbate to a poster of a Civic on your bedroom wall, doesn't mean they won't sell.
Reply
11-21-2007 @ 5:12PM
Jason said...
Ernie:
Just because they are the top sellers, does not mean people are buying them solely on how they look. In fact, its guaranteed thats not the only factor in buying them. But it sure as hell helps.
Just because multiple cars use the same body style has no bearing on whether or not that style is considered attractive. There are reasons why they have similar body styles.
Plenty of cars are beautiful but not top sellers because they are just too expensive. Lamborghinis, Ferrari's, Porsches (thought I dont like those), have nice body styles but are expensive for a multitude of other reasons.
The whole point is make you attractive body style which draws more interest to people. Then if the rest of the car makes sense, provides good value at a good price, with good features, people will buy it.
You cant honestly tell me that if you put a mustang or trans am or ferrari body on one these cars, that it wouldnt generate alot more interest and get alot more people buying.
Reply
11-24-2007 @ 6:26PM
GreyFlcn said...
==However, when well-to-wheels CO2 emissions are evaluated in comparison to gasoline engines, steam reformation and fuel cells show a sixty percent reduction.==
Says who?
Reply
11-24-2007 @ 6:30PM
GreyFlcn said...
re: Wayne
==Bad idea.
We already have technology that allows us to make hydrogen directly from water - in the vehicle, as needed - with no need to store the hydrogen at all.==
My guess is that Wayne believes that Stan Meyers wasn't a fraud, and somehow managed to bypass the laws of thermodynamics.
Only to have it such that noone could replicate his work.
Reply
12-03-2007 @ 5:17AM
PhilN said...
ChrisM you may be interested in this site
http://www.itm-power.com/
Reply
12-04-2007 @ 9:22AM
Used Cars said...
Well Done. Must be pretty cool to test drive these new cars. Hopefully it will become viable to mass produce.
Reply
1-14-2008 @ 11:10PM
Cozmo said...
Well if anything it certainly is ugly. :P
Reply