Filed under: Biodiesel, Ethanol
China invests heavily in biofuel technology to minimize food vs. fuel debate
China hosts about one fourth of the world's population but has only a 10 percent of the agricultural surface. This results in a great stress on the country's resources to produce enough of both foods and biofuels to meet the demand. Latest figures about China's interest in biofuels show that the country produces about one million tons of ethanol per year, but expects to produce 12 million in 2020 to reduce oil dependency. The bad part of this is that current ethanol-prodction methods in the country are far from being efficient. Officially, there are four facilities that produce ethanol, but the fact is that there are hundreds of small factories that produce ethanol from grains.
Brazil is eager to enter into the Chinese market, but Chinese authorities have decided that they cannot only rely on one source. Therefore, both the Minister of Agriculture and the Vice-President of the Development and Reform National Commission, Chen Deming, have announced that China is going to try to produce ethanol not from grains but from crops such as sweet sorghum (pictured), sugarcane and mandioca.
Whereas in some other places the food vs. biofuel debate seems to be out of the question (I insist on the "seems to be"), China's concerns seem correctly addressed due to the country's own resources limitations. The country is also developing all kind of crops that can yield more than current offerings, with extensive use of genetically modified seeds. To support this, the source article states that the Chinese Academy of Sciences invested 9 percent of its budget in biotechnology in 1999, whereas other equivalent institutions around the globe are currently investing from 2 to 5 percent.
Related:
- Will China lead the world in making the first hydrogen infrastructure a reality?
- China wants to join the club of the big ethanol producers
[Source: Econoticias]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
bob 7:41PM (9/13/2007)
Whenever someone quotes a stat that does not include relative and absolute numbers, you can be sure BS is in the wind.
"To support this, the source article states that the Chinese Academy of Sciences invested 9 percent of its budget in biotechnology in 1999, whereas other equivalent institutions around the globe are currently investing from 2 to 5 percent."
What are missing are the gross budgets for the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Let me give you and example.
Assume the Chinese budget is 1 million. Then 9% is 90,000.
Assume other "equivalent institutions" have budgets of 100 million. Then 5% is 5 million.
Hmmm, see how this is different that what the story tries to portray.
Be critical when you read "news".
Bob
Reply
Xavier Navarro 3:48AM (9/14/2007)
Of course I see your point but the whole idea of the article is showing that GM crops are expanding in China. It's either the excuse for biofuels (as it's the target for the article) or food crops, or, as somewhere in the source article, re-using land which otherwise would be too salty for "regular" crops.
Nevertheless, you are completely right about the percentages, but I also pressume that they will do more with 1 million than any Western institution with the same amount.
We all usually put the blame on China for lots of issues but their needs might be slightly different from us in the Western world.
Reply