ABG Driving Impression: 2008 Saab 9-3 Diesel
Filed under: Diesel, Saab, AutoblogGreen Exclusive

Click the Saab 9-3 diesel for a gallery
At the GM Powertrain technology show, they offered up a new 2008 Saab 9-3 equipped with a two-stage turbocharged 1.9L Family B diesel engine. The engine is another example of modern common rail injection diesel engines. As with all diesels, the engine exhibited no shortage of torque which is the performance parameter that really matters to the vast majority of drivers.
The engine proved to be strong and flexible at both highway speeds and in simulated urban driving. There was no noticeable turbo lag and stepping on the accelerator resulted in immediate response. The engine was as smooth and quiet as a good gasoline engine with no shaking or rattling. The engine has a particulate filter in the exhaust stream but otherwise doesn't meet current US NOx emissions standards. That would require the addition of urea injection or some other treatment system. Unfortunately, GM has no current plans to offer this engine in the US market although that could change if other upcoming diesels do well in the market.
The updated 2008 9-3 is something we will be seeing in the US market this fall. The updated face draws inspiration from the Aero-X concept and has a much more aggressive look than the previous model. The clear lens tail-lights are starting to become a cliche but the overall look is clean and attractive. The driving route was too short to really properly evaluate the ride and handling but the first impression was good and we look forward to a more thorough review of the new 9-3.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-28-2007 @ 10:07AM
D. See said...
Great car. Too bad it's another wonderful Euro-diesel that we'll never see thanks to B2/T5.
Good thing that our governmet condemns clean diesles like this, but continues to allow old, filthy trucks and busses continue to ply our roads.
God bless America!
Reply
8-29-2007 @ 9:22AM
rrfrench said...
Are the NOx emissions based on the total emissions per mile? Or is it emissions per gallon? Because I can't believe that NOx emissions from all these modern Euro-diesels could be worse than say... an F250 truck on a per mile driven basis.
I'm all for emissions standards but not for double standards. Especially when a number of HD trucks in my great state of Iowa spend
Reply
8-29-2007 @ 9:56AM
Jared said...
Heavy trucks (including F250 and up) do not have to meet the same regulations. Nevertheless, F250s now have a complex, expensive, and troublesome emission systems.
Reply
5-22-2008 @ 9:23PM
robert from virginia said...
GM and SAAB don't really care! They are followers rather than leaders!Arrogant and clueless as only American manufacturers can be! Waiting for others to bring diesel engines will result in us,SAAB owners, buying other vehicles!(Honda,Subaru,VW,BMW) I am already checking out the new 335td BMW since SAAB doesn't find it beneficial to bring their 1.9 TID engine to the US.
I am so disappointed! I really like my SAAB! We have 3 of them! Maybe the market economy should work and we should let SAAB die the way many other manufacturers did, including my family's Pierce and Arrow!
Reply