Filed under: Hydrogen, Chevrolet, GM, AutoblogGreen Exclusive
Two Chevy Sequels go over 300 miles on real roads with hydrogen to spare

On May 15, 2007 General Motors conducted what is believed to be the longest continuous drive ever with hydrogen fuel cell vehicles on public roads. We started the day off at GM's fuel cell research and development facility in Honeoye Falls New York with much of the staff of the facility on hand to send off the fleet of two Chevy Sequels and assorted support vehicles. Six members of the media were invited to participate in what was planned as a 300 mile drive starting at the facility near Rochester NY and finishing up at Lyndhurst Castle in Tarrytown.
The Sequel is a fuel concept that GM unveiled in mid-2006. It's a crossover utility built on top of a skateboard type chassis that includes the fuel storage tanks, batteries, fuel cell stack, wheel motors and assorted control electronics. The original skateboard chassis concept in the form of the Autonomy concept several years ago was developed by a team led by Christopher Borroni-Bird who is the Director of Advanced Technology Vehicle Concepts for General Motors. Since the vehicles where first shown last year the control system has remained under continuous development by engineers trying to optimize the powertrain control strategy to maximize the range.
Continue reading about our Sequel adventure after the jump.
Gallery: Chevy Sequel 300 Mile Drive
The team set out from the research center shortly after 7:00am on a predefined route with a mix of driving conditions through upstate New York including about 55 miles of freeway driving. The route carried us past the Finger Lakes, through the Catskills including many small towns and included lots of hill climbing. The plan called for each of the six journalists to spend about 100 miles behind the wheel of one of the two vehicles to get a feel for how they work in real world conditions.

Both Sequels were filled with hydrogen that had been generated not far from Rochester in Niagara Falls using hydro-electric power from the falls so no fossil fuels were used to power them that day. Things mostly went according to plan although we did have a few glitches along the way. Each of the Sequels carried one journalist, one engineer and either GM Vice President Larry Burns or Sequel Chief Engineer Mohsen Shabana. The engineer in the back seat was equipped with a laptop to monitor all the vehicle's vital signs which turned out to be good thing.
In order to ensure the safety of the fleet and the participants GM set some strict operating parameters. If anything got out of range the whole convoy would pull over immediately so the engineers could diagnose the problem. If they couldn't sort it out within five minutes, the other half of the team would go on and the stranded vehicle would either catch up or get loaded on trailer that tracked our route.
During the course of the 300-mile drive we had to pull over unexpectedly three times. In each case the vehicles ultimately got back underway and in each case the reason for stopping was apparent high battery temperatures. The issue on the vehicle that stopped twice turned out to be a faulty sensor which was replaced but the battery temperature in the other Sequel actually did get a bit too high.

The Sequel engineering team
Aside from the that the vehicles performed flawlessly and actually got better than expected fuel economy. The Sequel, like the other fuel cell vehicles I've driven, behaved very normally which is particularly impressive given the drive-by-wire nature of the Sequel. The Sequel has four wheel steering with a rack in the front that has an actuator and two individual actuators on the rear wheels. The brakes have electrically actuated friction brakes with regenerative braking blended in and throughout the drive never exhibited any out the ordinary behavior.
The Sequel has the fourth-generation GM fuel cell technology which is the same type used in the upcoming fuel cell Equinox that will be part of the Project Driveway program this fall. At the recent Shanghai Motor Show GM unveiled a version of the Volt concept with the new fifth generation stack which doubles the power density of the stack in the Sequel. Even with the now-superseded fuel cell stack technology. the challenge was to cover a distance of at least 300 miles.
As it turned out both vehicles ran the full distance arriving at Lyndhurst Castle in Tarrytown New York eight and a half hours after leaving Honeoye Falls having covered a little over 302 miles. Each Sequel still had at least 1kg of hydrogen left in the tank which would have carried the vehicles over forty more miles. Considering the driving conditions with traffic jams, construction zones and air conditioning running almost the whole way on a day that ended at eighty degrees this is quite an achievement.
No one else is known to have gone this far under these conditions on a single tankful of hydrogen before. The only really technical issues that we encountered were elevated temperatures in the lithium ion batteries. The batteries used in the Sequels are air cooled but talking to Larry Burns when we were approaching the end of the trek, he indicated that it's looking like liquid cooling is going to be required in order to achieve the robust thermal management that will be required for production applications.
At the finish line a clearly delighted Larry Burns spoke to the crowd of local schoolchildren and other onlookers who had awaited our arrival and told them this is just the beginning of the transformation of the automobile. He clearly believes in this technology because it will free us from dependency on oil. No matter what you think of hydrogen as an energy carrier, the fact is that a lot engineers and technicians have worked very hard for many years and achieved a lot. The Sequel is one of the most technologically advanced vehicles in the world and it works. Not all of the technology contained within these concepts will appear at the same time, but over time it will probably filter into the cars we all drive.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Howard Lee Harkness 9:50AM (5/16/2007)
"in the lithium ion batteries."
LiON? Excuse me, but if the car has LiON batteries, then I suspect that a big part of the range was accomplished from the initial charge on the LiON battery, and not from the hydrogen.
"He clearly believes in this technology because it will free us from dependency on oil."
Larry Burns is wrong. Commercial quantities of hydrogen are not produced with electrolysis (like in this contrived demo) because methane reformation is MUCH cheaper. However, nothing impedes understanding as much has having your job depend on not understanding.
You could take this car, remove all of the hydrogen nonsense, replace it with the same weight in LiON, and get the same or better range at a tiny fraction of the cost. Add a $200 diesel generator with 10 gallons of biodiesel, and extend that range substantially.
Some things missing from the article (a common occurrence in hydrogen propaganda):
1) Tank capacity (by extrapolation, the tank probably held between 8 and 9 kg, but the pressure is not given).
2) Cost of the hydrogen (fully loaded, not just the cost of production).
3) Size and weight of the H2 containment system.
4) Cost of the car.
Just for comparison, my Toyota Tacoma ($20k) can travel about 400 miles on about $50 worth of gasoline (one tank full).
Reply
Giancarlo 10:11AM (5/16/2007)
I would like to know:
what storage medium (compressed @how many psi?) and total H2 (in kg);
what is the platinum content of the Chevy FC in mg/cm2 and total;
an efficiency estimation tank to wheels?
Thanks
Reply
Schmeltz 10:30AM (5/16/2007)
Way to go GM! My main concern after reading the article was those overheating batteries. I hope they can design a better means of keeping them cool and under control.
Reply
Peter 12:14PM (5/16/2007)
Range is not the same thing as efficiency. You could put an oversized gas tank in a standard car or an oversized battery in an electric car and go 1000 miles. But that wouldn't prove anything about how much range is feasible in a real car after considering constraints of cost, weight, package size, and durability.
Reply
mbongo 1:44PM (5/16/2007)
Why only negative comments from all of you guys? As Toyota guys, you just can't accept that other can do something better. For me, you just don't get it. This think really works and you will be very, very surprised. By the way, Toyota Tundra Crew Cab got 4 stars.
Reply
fermionichadrons 1:44PM (5/16/2007)
I think that it is quite an achievement but obviously there is still a way to go.
but from other sources for those who are wondering:
Tank capacity was less than seven kilograms and range on batteries alone was 20 miles. link: http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007705160319
Cost of the car:
$35 million!!! link: http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007705160350
Reply
mbongo 1:46PM (5/16/2007)
Why only negative comments from all of you guys? As Toyota guys, you just can't accept that others can do something better. For me, you just don't get it. I saw this car last year in California. This thing really works and you will be very, very surprised. By the way, Toyota Tundra Crew Cab got only 4 stars.
Reply
Ricahrd 1:53PM (5/16/2007)
1. Sorry your Tacoma only gets about 400 mi on a tankful!
Chevrolet Colorado with 2 gal. smaller tank gets about 430 mi. to the tankful.
I see your a GM basher, too bad.
This was a real world test not a to production simulation, so the price of these two vehicles is a non-starter.
Pretty hard for you to give a little credit, really sad!!
GM's electric Impact was a first, cancelled but they've seen the light, focus is on.
They've paid in spades for the decisions of Roger Smith in the 80's
Reply
Michael 2:03PM (5/16/2007)
$35,000,000 for that POS?!?!?!?!?!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
not thanks! this makes the Tesla Roadster sound very inexpensive.
-Michael
Reply
Greg 2:06PM (5/16/2007)
While I agree with many of the above questions and comments, I do not share the overall negative viewpoint of many of the posters ... the Sequel is a concept car, and this was a very good real-world test, nothing more, nothing less ... I'm an engineer who worked with fuel cells for a number of years, so I understand the amount of effort it took to pull this off ... and I would have been shocked if GM had not omitted or glossed over details regarding the actual eventual practicality of the concept ... color me impressed, but like several others above I sure would like to peek at the hard data!
Reply
MikeW 2:22PM (5/16/2007)
300miles is still not enough for a non existent infrastructure.
They should list the BTU equivalence for the H2.
Reply
rick 3:20PM (5/16/2007)
I love the checkered flooring that the Sequel is parked on. Does anyone know where I can get some of that flooring for my garage?
Reply
unclewill 5:10PM (5/16/2007)
The checkered floor is called Racedeck find it through Google.
I don't know about you kids, but I drive 22 miles per day for my commute and I have a one hour lunch which pretty much limits me to 82 miles per work day. If I had a car with a range of 82 miles that would pretty much meet my commuting needs. If electricity is used to make 82 miles worth of hydrogen per 24 hours (one refill per day) and I could use solar and wind power at my home to generate while I'm at work, then I commute for free. Now put this into a package which is priced to reflect the total expected life of the vehicle and viola - no more oil, no more fluctuating energy prices, no more pollution. How can we lose? Drive the Ferrari on weekends...
Reply
Frances 5:12PM (5/16/2007)
I don't share the pessimism. These are advanced concept cars. They work. There are problems to be sorted out, but they run, and quite a distance too.
Are there many problems to be sorted out, obviously. Does it have a chance to be something good some day, I would think so. If some of the money for the live fire drill in Bagdad had been used to do some high-powered R&D on this vehicle, the whole Iraq story could have been avoided.
Oil is going to run, sooner or later. When that time comes we are going to need something different. This is a really good start. Saying 'but, but, it's never going to work' is not the spirit of free enterprise that made the US great. It is not a question of -if- but -when- oil will run out. GM is doing a great thing by looking into a solution for a problem that is sure to arise, maybe in our life times.
A big company that actually looks ahead. It deserves a warmer welcome that sneering derision.
GM: keep up the good work.
Reply
ROb 5:13PM (5/16/2007)
I think you guys are not getting the point...5 years ago people were saying this wouldn't happen at all...it has...within the next 5 years I bet ya they will be selling them. BMW is leasing them right now. If I only got 350 miles per tank that's fine, I'm happy because 1)On that 350 miles is NO emissions, and 2) NO Foreign Oil used.
Reply
Bob 6:02PM (5/16/2007)
I don't think extended charge/refuel times are going to be a show-stopper.
I think we are entering a new era in automotive history - the era of the "commuter car".
Most people commute 30 miles or less to work each way. So they need a car that can travel, say, 100 miles each day to get to and from work, and pick up the kids and some milk from the store before going home for the night. Then they can plug in their car, charge it overnight, and be good for another 100 miles the next day.
We will all still have our petroleum burning cars for long-distance weekend travel or utility work.
These "commuter cars" will need to be low-cost and highly efficient - basically covered motorcycles, much like the SmartCar.
Reply
Rick 9:10AM (5/17/2007)
What are those big voided shapes (holes) on the front and rear? It looks like they ran out of panel parts and the jigsaw puzzle body is incomplete. $35K? Whoa, good luck with that.
http://www.pawpastries.com
Reply
Will 9:39AM (5/17/2007)
The gaps in the rear bodywork are probably part of the air cooling system for the batteries.
Reply
John 1:15PM (5/17/2007)
Can you forgive GM's past and trust them with our future? Research GM and what they have done to the United States.
Reply
David Herron 4:55PM (5/17/2007)
Yawn, Solectria accomplished the same range nearly 10 years ago with a NiMH battery powered car. It would be quite easy to accomplish this with a LION battery powered car. Why do we need to take this questionable detour to fuel cells??
Reply