Shanghai Motor Show: GM unveils fuel cell E-Flex
Filed under: EV/Plug-in, Hydrogen, GM, AutoblogGreen Exclusive

click on the image for a high-res gallery of the fuel cell E-Flex platform
In the last few months General Motors has been on real energy diversity kick. They seem to have bought wholeheartedly into the idea that monocultures are bad, particularly when it comes to energy supplies. While ninety-eight percent of the energy that we use for motorized transportation today is derived from petroleum, it isn't going to remain that way forever. We've already started seeing a shift toward biofuels and electric drive systems that can get their energy from any number of sources. Back in January General Motors showed the world their new E-Flex electric drive platform in the form of a chassis mock-up of a plug-in series hybrid system and the Chevrolet Volt concept. At the time and repeatedly since GM has emphasized that the power-train system is designed to be modular and flexible to allow for many different energy sources to be used. They showed renderings of E-Flex powered entirely by batteries and also by fuel cells. At the 2007 Shanghai Motor Show, GM is unveiling the second major E-Flex variant with a hydrogen fuel cell powertrain. The new E-Flex version is powered by GM's new fifth-generation stack, which may well be the best performing fuel cell yet.
Continue reading all about the fuel cell E-Flex after the jump.
[Source: General Motors]


GM vice-president of Research and Development Larry Burns gave AutoblogGreen a preview of the new E-Flex and the fifth-generation stack that will be used on future GM fuel cell vehicles. The E-Flex system is built on top of the next generation of GM's global compact car platform which currently goes under the codename Delta and will be the basis of the replacements for the current Chevy Cobalt and Opel/Saturn Astra. This all means that major components like suspension, brakes, chassis rails and other items can be common between conventionally powered and E-Flex versions. All that should help keep the costs of E-Flex vehicles to a manageable level.
The original E-Flex used a plug-in series hybrid propulsion system with a 16kWh lithium ion battery and a flex-fuel internal combustion range extender. Version two still has plug-in capability but cuts the battery size in half (along with the battery-powered range). While the Volt and Ford's HySeries drive system both rely on the batteries as the primary source of electricity for the motor, the new edition uses the battery for supplementary power to reduce the transient loads on the fuel cell stack making it a parallel hybrid system. The 16kWh lithium ion battery pack of the original now has half as many cells and a capacity of 8kWh giving a battery range of 20 miles. The same 70kW motor from the Volt drives the front wheels of the new chassis and is joined by a pair of 25kW hub motors at the back end to provide all wheel drive capability. The hub motors are GM's third generation coreless motors. They are more efficient and lighter than the units used in the Sequel. This is a similar arrangement to the existing Sequel concept, but aside from the basics of the powertrain configuration all the details are different.
While the Sequel used General Motors fourth-generation fuel stack in a horizontal arrangement in the skateboard chassis the E-Flex uses a fifth generation stack. The dramatically improved efficiency of the new design, allows the E-Flex to maintain the same 300-mile range but from only 4kg of hydrogen compared to the 8kg in the Sequel. The new stack is also only half the size of the old stack with the same power.


The new stack has a vertical orientation like the latest Honda vertical flow stack in the FCX concept but the hydrogen still flows horizontally through the stack. In spite of that, the new manufacturing techniques developed by General Motors have allowed them to increase the power density to 3kW/L and 2kW/kg. They can now get 80kW of power from a package that is half the size of the units in the Sequel and Equinox. By comparison the latest Honda stack only achieves 2kW/L and 1.5kW/kg.
At the same time the cost of the new generation stack has been reduced through the use of catalyst thrifting. GM has put a lot of effort in developing new ways of applying platinum to the electrodes in the stack to achieve an even spread while minimizing the amount needed. Larry Burns believes that GM will achieve their goal of having a fuel cell system design by the end of 2009 that can be produced in million-unit annual volumes at a cost of $50/kW with 150,000 mile life span and 300 mile range. That price point will put the system on a par with conventional internal combustion drivetrains. Because the volumes obviously won't be at the million unit level in that time frame, the costs will still be higher and drop as they ramp up production.
GM is actively working on the production engineering of both the series hybrid and fuel cell versions of the E-Flex platform although the series hybrid variant is likely to see higher volume production first. The lithium ion batteries are being tested now and given the developments that we've seen in the industry in the past two years, it seems likely that we will see something like this by 2010-11. After the Project Driveway Equinox production run is completed, the next fuel cell vehicle will probably be based on E-Flex. The chassis being shown at Shanghai is just a mock-up but GM is promising another big E-Flex announcement in September at the Frankfurt Motor Show. That one will likely be a fully functional running E-Flex vehicle prototype.


CHEVROLET VOLT CONCEPT SEDAN SPECIFICATIONS
Overview
|
Model: |
Chevrolet Volt Concept |
|
Body style / driveline: |
4-5-passenger sedan, unitized frame, all wheel drive electric propulsion |
|
Construction: |
body-frame-integral structure with composite exterior panels and roof |
|
EPA vehicle class |
compact car (four doors with rear liftgate) |
Propulsion System
|
Description: |
All wheel electrically driven propulsion system using a fuel cell and a "plug in" charged storage battery |
|
Fuel Cell: |
|
|
Type: |
Proton Exchange Membrane |
|
Peak Power: |
80 kW |
|
Continuous Power: |
80 kW |
|
Hydrogen Storage Capacity: |
4.0 kg in two Type 4 tanks |
|
|
|
|
Type: |
lithium-ion |
|
Energy: |
8 kWh (total) |
|
Peak power: |
50 kW |
|
Voltage: |
320 to 350 |
|
Charger: |
|
|
Type: |
On board plug in |
|
Voltage / amp: |
110 / 15 (typical household supply) |
|
|
|
|
110-volt outlet: |
3.5 to 4 hours |
|
Electric traction system: |
|
|
Front drive motor max mech power: |
70 kW |
|
Front drive motor torque (lb-ft/Nm) |
250 Nm (motor) |
|
Rear wheel motor max mech pwr (x2): |
25 kW |
|
Rear drive motor torque (lb-ft/Nm) (x2) |
500 Nm (wheel) |
|
Electric mode range: |
20 miles – on battery stored power |
|
0 to 60 mph: |
8 to 8.5 seconds |
|
Top speed – Burst (mph) |
120 mph |
|
Top speed – Continuous (mph) |
100 mph |
Chassis/Suspension
|
Front: |
independent, strut-type |
|
Rear: |
semi-independent torsion beam |
|
Steering type: |
electric, speed-sensitive, variable assist rack-and-pinion |
|
Turning circle, curb-to-curb (ft / m): |
37 to 38 / 11.2 to 11.5 |
Brakes
|
Type: |
electro-hydraulic power assisted; front disc, rear drum |
Wheels/Tires
|
Wheel size (in): |
21 x 6.5 |
|
Tires: |
195/55R21, low-rolling resistance |
Dimensions
Exterior
|
Overall length (in / mm): |
170 / 4318 |
|
Height (in / mm): |
52.6 / 1336 |
|
Width (in / mm): |
70.5 / 1791 |
Interior
|
Seating capacity (front / rear): |
2 / 2 |
|
Headroom (in / mm): |
front: 37.3 / 947 rear: 35.9 / 912 |
|
Legroom (in / mm): |
31.5 / 802 |
|
Shoulder room (in / mm): |
50.6 / 1285 |
|
Hip room (in / mm): |
53.1 / 1349 |
Related:



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
4-19-2007 @ 10:33PM
Brother Alec said...
Cool!
Now all we need to do is drill some hydrogen wells and start pumping all that good clean fuel to the surface!
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 2:49AM
kert said...
does it run ?
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 4:02AM
Chris M said...
So far, GM has proposed 4 versions of "E-Flex": one with a gasoline range extender, one with a diesel range extender, one with a H2 fuel cell range extender, and a battery only version. Which of these will never go into commercial production?
Considering the high price of fuel cells and the high price of H2 and the high price of H2 storage, why would anyone in their right mind choose the H2 fuel cell version?
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 6:13AM
kert said...
::GM has proposed 4 versions of "E-Flex"
Proposals and exhibitions are nice. Does it run ?
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 10:02AM
phoenexius said...
Did anyone else make the correlation between the E-Flex being on Delta (GM global small car) and the recent announcement for shuffling of production lines in Europe for global c-platform car in 2011?
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/next-gen-astra-world-car-to-cost-gm-4-2-billion/
At first $4.2Billion seemed like a lot. Now it's starting to make some sense.
WICKED!!
fingers crossed
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 10:06AM
Sam Abuelsamid said...
Don't forget the 400 engineers and techs they are hiring.
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/04/13/do-you-want-to-work-on-advanced-powertrains-gm-wants-you/
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 11:05AM
Karl Cox said...
I'm not real excited about this because hydrogen fuel cell technology is still over 50 years away from being a viable oil alternative. Plug-in hybrid technology is here today, however.
The Case for Plug-in Hybrid Technology
PROS
1) Near Energy Independance
2) Hundred of billions of dollars staying in our economy each year (100% of the electricity purchased each year in the U.S. is made in the U.S.)
3) Large increase in Jobs (see #2)
4) Less terrorism (see #2)
5) Fewer wars over oil
6) Reduced transportation costs for everyone ("filling up" with electricity cost the equivalent of $0.50/gallon)
7) Less carbon going into the atmosphere
CONS
1) Having to plug your car in each night.
Why haven't we already switched to this technology?
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 12:09PM
naggs said...
interesting that it has rear drums. they must be integrated into the wheel hub motors.
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 12:09PM
naggs said...
in the pics you can clearly see the radiator. i didnt know that PEM fuel cells generated that kind of heat. or maybe its for the electric motor? either way you can see the electricly driven water pump. looks like even with electric cars we will be getting our cabin heating with an old fashioned heater core.
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 1:11PM
Tim said...
The beauty in the E-Flex series PHEV concept’s lies in its redundant simplicity and flexibility. The multiple "range extender" option allows the local market to choose what's best for them by voting with their wallets. This concept proves that there are still many brilliant and innovative people at GM.
The best part is that every day GM appears to be more serious about actually producing E-Flex. I’m an optimist, however we’ve all been disappointed many times before because GM “cried wolf.” I for one will remain skeptical until I can buy one from my local dealer’s showroom. I’d like the biodiesel range extender option please. My favorite color is midnight blue with faux tan leather interior. Heated seats and mirrors and a GPS system would be nice too. How about a convertible? Yep… I’m an optimist.
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 2:44PM
Owen said...
Karl,
You must live in a city because you forgot one additional drawback... Long trips. Many people travel farther than 250 miles in a day (the current best claim for a PHEV) on many weekend I would travel 1K + miles, with 5 people in a little Honda Fit. I even have a trip that I do 2x a year where I drive 3K miles in 2 days. Granted, I'm the exception not the rule, but there aren't that many people with the financial capability of having different cars for long trips, vs. thier commuter car. Even if it's charging ports vs. gas stations, we need something to extend the range at regular intervals.
Tim,
You may be an optimist, but I like the way you think. It's nice to believe that we would someday have the option of chosing what our range extending drive would be, plug it in at night for those commuter days, and then just fill it up with whatever all this fuel nonsense shakes itself out to be (something not petroleum based) for the longer trips.
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 3:40PM
Ray said...
@ #8..
There's another photo of the E-Volt chassis in the gallery that shows rear *disc* brakes. I wonder if GM has 2 different designs.
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 4:23PM
Peter said...
Some people drive more than 250 miles each day but many many more drive fewer than 50. The average US commute is about 30 miles round trip. An overwhelming majority of people could own short range cars and rent long range cars for road trips, resulting in a huge savings of money and a reduction in pollution.
One vehicle does not have to meet every conceivable need and anything that does will inevitably be an overbuilt compromise. I can't fit a 4x8 sheet of plywood in my car but the Home Depot will gladly rent me a pickup for the one or two days a decade that I need to.
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 8:26PM
241 said...
Let GM market it to the united states us market
www.2241glasses.com
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 8:45PM
ImReadyToBuy said...
Hydrogen requires me to go to a "gas" station and pay money to oil companies who will manufacture, distribute and sell it. Which means no choice for the consumer and being tied to whatever the oil companies decide to charge.
Build the plug-in 40 mile battery range with gas/diesel range extender now. GM just keeps spewing hydrogen gas to keep the consumer off balance. If they can put "expensive" lithium batteries and a very expensive fuel cell in a car and act like it's marketable and then complain they can't produce the volt that only has "expensive" batteries and cheap conventional gas/diesel engine because it "costs" too much doesn't cut it with me.
GM stop trying to save the oil companies with hydrogen, produce the plug-in 40 mile battery 600 mile range extender gas/diesel now.
I'm ready to buy are you ready to sell?
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 9:26PM
Chris M said...
Quote: "Many people travel farther than 250 miles in a day (the current best claim for a PHEV)"...
Way wrong! The Prius can easily go over 400 miles on one tank of gas, and so can the "plug-in" modified Prius. Need to go farther? Just fill up at any available gas station. GMs proposed "E-flex Volt" is supposed to go even farther per tank (assuming it gets built).
The point of plug-in hybrids is that you can do your local driving on clean cheap electricity, but you still can use gasoline (more expensive but quick filling) for those rare long road trips.
Reply
4-20-2007 @ 11:12PM
Dsuupr said...
Ok GM. Now do something different, and make E-Flex a standard part of the next generation small cars for Europe and North America.
Reply
4-21-2007 @ 11:13AM
Al Roderick said...
Problem there is that E-Flex is not a part, it is an entirely new type of powertrain. Thus, it can't be integrated into existing car models easily. I'm still looking forward to it when it does make it to market, it'll make a nice complement to the Peterbilt Class 8 Hybrid road tractor semi that I have my eye on for the 2010 model year. 8 MPG sounds really good when you're accustomed to 6.
Reply
4-21-2007 @ 1:17PM
Sam Abuelsamid said...
Al, that's not entirely true. E-Flex is based on the next generation GM compact car architecture (Cobalt, Astra). The platform is being developed to accommodate the electric drive train components along with whatever power source is used. That's part is trying to make the whole E-Flex concept affordable.
Reply
4-21-2007 @ 9:01PM
Chris M said...
Larry Burns believes that GM will achieve their goal of having a fuel cell system design by the end of 2009 that can be produced in million-unit annual volumes at a cost of $50/Kw.
Considering that the current price is $5,000 per Kw, and that "low price" was only achieved after 40 years of development work, I find it highly unlikely that they will be anywhere near that goal in a mere 2 years.
Well, the CEO wanted it by 2009, so the engineers say "they can do it" just to keep their jobs.
Reply