Critics say automakers can be greener with better computer programming
Filed under: Etc., Green Culture, MPG, Legislation and Policy

Twenty years ago, hot rodders were buying "chips" for the engines to boost power. These E-PROM chips carried the fuel and spark programming codes in the engine-control units (ECU). Instead of manually adjusting the spark advance and rejetting a carburetor, tuners on EFI engines would have to pull the chip and reprogram the fuel and spark maps with a computer. Modern cars have flash memory in the ECUs. Today's tuners going for more power either replace the entire ECU or reflash the program.
A leading online seller of new cars in England says automakers aren't getting the most green out of their engine-management computers. Ling Valentine says the same engine is spread over a variety of vehicles and programmed for reliability and reduced service intervals.
Simon Hall, who runs a reprogramming shop for a variety of vehicles, makes the same argument that today's vehicles can be greener with a few changes in the computer code.
Basically, the two feel that consumers should be allowed to "chip" their cars without fear of losing a warranty.
Related:
[Source: Auto Industry]











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-06-2007 @ 6:45PM
Ling Valentine said...
Wow! I am Ling, you americanised my moan about car makers so well! My main gripe is that cars are always (by the nature of the fast-moving software business) old in programming terms. Imagine a graphics card, new software every month! Surely 3rd parties can improve programming of ECUs? Why not allow green-chipping? Everyone focuses on power, they should look at real-world efficiency.
I have the greenest new-car selling website in the UK, http://www.lingscars.com and I am introducing the American concept of fixed mileage leasing to the UK. Plus I display full enviro-info ON THE FRONT PAGE for every car, something UK new car dealers are scared to do.
Reply