Ford unveils PHEV Ford Edge with HySeries Drive at DC Auto Show
Filed under: EV/Plug-in, Hybrid, Hydrogen, Ford

Click on the image for a gallery of high-res photos of the HySeries Drive Edge
At the Washington D.C. Auto Show, Ford unveiled a Ford Edge equipped with the HySeries Drive power-train first shown in the Airstream concept a couple of weeks ago in Detroit. HySeries Drive is a plug-in series hybrid system, that uses a 336V lithium ion battery pack to drive the electric motor. This makes it the world's first drivable hydrogen fuel cell vehicle with plug-in capability. The full range of the Edge on battery and hydrogen is 225 miles with the first 25 available on battery alone, although some drivers have seen as much as 400 miles depending the conditions. They estimate the gasoline equivalent mileage of the HySeries Edge at 41 mpg city/highway combined if you drive the full range. Like the Volt or other plug-in hybrids the effective mileage goes up as the distance you drive goes down.The vehicle features the latest generation Ballard Power Systems fuel cell stack. Unlike the fuel cells used in the Focus FCV, this one is capable of operating at cold temperatures down to -20C. The HySeries Drive Edge is being used to prove out the new drive-train concept. Similar to what GM has done with E-Flex, the Edge system is designed to allow flexibility in replacing the power systems. They could easily swap out the fuel cell stack for gas or diesel engines or even more batteries. Ford has spent the weekend the shuttling Capital Hill staffers around in the new Edge and in the very near future AutoblogGreen will be bringing you a full driving impression of the HySeries Drive Edge. In the meantime the Ford press release is after the jump, and gallery of high res images can be found by clicking on the image above.
[Source: Ford]
FORD UNVEILS WORLD'S FIRST DRIVABLE FUEL CELL HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE WITH PLUG-IN CAPABILITY
- The Ford Edge with HySeries Drive™ is the world's first drivable fuel cell hybrid electric vehicle with plug-in capability.
- Ford's flexible powertrain architecture enables the use of new fuel and propulsion technologies as they develop without redesigning the vehicle and its control systems.
- The HySeries Drive technology is able to operate using a fuel cell, small gasoline or diesel engine connected to an electric generator to make electricity.
WASHINGTON, D.C., Jan. 23, 2007 – Ford Motor Company [NYSE: F] today unveiled the world's first drivable fuel cell hybrid electric plug-in that combines an onboard hydrogen fuel cell generator with lithium-ion batteries to deliver more than 41 mpg with zero emissions. The vehicle is built on a flexible powertrain architecture that will enable Ford to use new fuel and propulsion technologies as they develop without redesigning the vehicle.
"This vehicle offers Ford the ultimate in flexibility in researching advanced propulsion technology," said Gerhard Schmidt, vice president of research and advanced engineering for Ford Motor Company. "We could take the fuel cell power system out and replace it with a down-sized diesel, gasoline engine or any other powertrain connected to a small electric generator to make electricity like the fuel cell does now."
The new HySeries Drive™ powertrain featured in a Ford Edge uses a real-world version of the powerplant envisioned in the Ford Airstream concept unveiled earlier this month at the 2007 North American International Auto Show in Detroit. The HySeries Drive powertrain delivers a combined city/highway gasoline equivalent fuel economy rating of 41 mpg. For those who drive less than 50 miles each day, the average jumps to more than 80 mpg.
"We wanted to take what was in a 'gee whiz' vehicle like the Airstream and connect it with something people are driving on the road today, something that wasn't just a futuristic concept vehicle," Schmidt said.
The plug-in hybrid is powered by a 336-volt lithium-ion battery pack at all times. The vehicle drives the first 25 miles each day on stored electricity alone, after which the fuel cell begins operating to keep the battery pack charged. This provides another 200 miles of range for a total of 225 miles with zero emissions. Individual experiences will vary widely and can stretch out the time between fill-ups to more than 400 miles: drivers with modest daily needs would need to refuel only rarely, drivers who travel less than 50 miles each day will see fuel economy well over 80 mpg, while those with long daily commutes will see somewhat lower numbers as the fuel cell must run a larger fraction of the time.
The Ford Edge with HySeries Drive can travel at speeds of up to 85 mph. An on-board charger (110/220 VAC) can refresh the battery pack when a standard home outlet is available, making the concept a true plug-in hybrid.
When the battery pack is depleted to approximately 40 percent, the hydrogen fuel cell – supplied by Ford partner Ballard – automatically turns on and begins generating electricity to recharge the batteries. Like a conventional automobile, the Ford Edge with HySeries Drive will go until it runs out of fuel – in this case via a 350-bar hydrogen tank that supplies 4.5 kg of useable hydrogen.
The HySeries Drive name is derived from the powertrain's structure: a hydrogen fuel-cell-powered series hybrid drivetrain. This highly innovative approach reduces the size, weight, cost and complexity of a conventional fuel cell system by more than 50 percent. It also promises to more than double the lifetime of the fuel cell stack.
This flexible powertrain architecture enables the use of new fuel and propulsion technologies as they develop and become available without the need to redesign the vehicle and its control systems.
Certainly, many significant technical hurdles need to be overcome before a vehicle such as the Edge with HySeries Drive can become a reality. Fuel cell vehicles remain expensive, costing millions of dollars each. And the single biggest hurdle to plug-ins remains the cost of lithium-ion batteries. Much work also needs to be done to make fuel cells more durable and to create a hydrogen infrastructure.
Hydrogen Part of a Broader Effort At Ford
Research into hydrogen, including the Ford Edge with HySeries Drive, is part of Ford's overall effort to address the challenges of climate change and energy independence. Ford is moving ahead with a range of technology solutions simultaneously, including vehicles such as the Ford Escape Hybrid and Mercury Mariner Hybrid, hydrogen fuel cells, hydrogen internal combustion engines, ethanol, clean diesel and refinements to gasoline fueled engines and advanced transmissions. Some of the technology, such as that seen in Ford's lineup of hybrid vehicles, represents near-term approaches. Other technology, including hydrogen fell cells, must be viewed as a long-term option.
Ford began working on hydrogen technology in the early 1990s. Ford's first hydrogen fuel cell vehicle, released in 2001, was based on a lightweight aluminum sedan body, which also was used in the development of the company's first hydrogen-powered internal combustion engine.
The company currently has a fleet of 30 hydrogen-powered Focus fuel cell vehicles on the road as part of a worldwide, seven-city program to conduct real-world testing of fuel cell technology. The fleet has accumulated more than 300,000 miles since its inception. With this fleet on the road, a great deal of information that can be integrated into future fuel cell vehicle propulsion systems is being generated in different local environmental conditions.
Having the fleet outside the confines of Ford Motor Company also has allowed the team to gain valuable feedback on servicing vehicles in the field. As a hydrogen infrastructure is developed and implemented for the fleet at each location, lessons learned are being generated to ensure that the customer and hydrogen fueling interface is seamless and customer friendly.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
1-23-2007 @ 10:26AM
Tim said...
Hydrogen is idiotic on so many levels. One is the fact that Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV) are FOUR TIMES more efficient than fuel cell vehicles. http://www.physorg.com/news85074285.html Regardless of the laws of physics, The auto companies will continue to work with H2 as long as they are receiving free (tax) money to do so.
Cars are a status symbol. NOW… Imagine if GM, Ford (or anyone) offered a 4X4 series PHEV SUV, pickup, crossover etc. with 40 mile all electric range and a 100-MPG rating within 70 miles on flex fuel or biodiesel. Now think of a highly flexible drive by wire vehicle layout that is cheaper to build and more robust than the current geared drive train. One Range Extender “engine”, one motor controller, 4 electric wheel motors with max torque from 0-full RPM, The motor controller computer can independently control each wheel motor! Now, the options are unlimited…
NORMAL ECONOMY MODE – Only one drive wheel receives power until slip occurs then power could be transferred as required. Drive timers could make sure that each wheel motor receives equal drive time (power) over the life of the vehicle maximizing motor life. Good for normal or slippery conditions on hard surfaces, rain, snow, sand, or even rock crawling where each wheel’s independently controlled torque and limited slip are paramount.
4X LOCK MODE – All wheels are locked to rotate at the same speed. Good for sticky surface conditions such as mud, hill climbing etc where spinning may help clean the treads and improve traction.
4X SKID-STEER MODE – Under say, 5-mph the right wheels and left wheels could be locked together like a skid-steel loader. Forward the left wheels while reversing the right ones or visa-versa and you have ZERO TURN RADIOUS. There could be a small joystick that takes the place of the old manual shift knob or the steering wheel could lock dead-center and the top could separate into 2 control levers. THE ULTIMATE 4X4!!! Humm…. Military applications anyone?
Since drive-train geometry is no longer an issue, pneumatic shocks could raise or lower the vehicle to pre-programmed heights as needed and load cells on each wheel could monitor conditions and attitude adjusted to keep center of gravity as low as possible to reduce rollovers. The options are up to your imagination. This is the true power of a series hybrid!
Reply
1-23-2007 @ 3:02PM
Markus said...
Very good statement from Tim. Respecting the hydrogen topic, I can 100% agree to the opinion of Tim. Hydrogen economy doesn't make sense!
Reply
1-23-2007 @ 5:11PM
junkie said...
I really like this vehicle and concept. I don't think it matters that much whether its a hydrogen fuel cell, methanol or other kind of electrical generation. The point is that it combines batteries (quick power), fuel cells (efficient conversion) and chemical energy storage (range, fast refill).
Reply
1-23-2007 @ 6:18PM
Tim said...
Junkie - Fuel cells are 75% LESS efficient http://www.physorg.com/news85074285.html than Battery Electric Vehicle to Grid (V2G). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_to_grid However, I now believe that there is a place for Hydrogen…
We all know that Hydrogen as an inefficient energy carrier. HOWEVER, using Hydrogen injection to enhance combustion in IC engines has been studied for many years. Here’s some information about GM’s EcoTec engine designs. Quote “Small concentrations of gaseous hydrogen present in combustion with other fuels yielded substantial emissions, and fuel consumption decreases, while efficiency (and power, depending on the chosen equivalence ratio) experienced significant increases.” http://www.wlhs.wlwv.k12.or.us/students/marcusb/hydrogenfuelpage.htm This site also has many links to tech such as
• A turbocharger forced induction system
• A primary ethanol fuel system
• An oxygen-enrichment membrane separation unit
• A supplementary hydrogen injection system.
This is some pretty interesting stuff.
BOTTOM LINE: Electrolyzing water on-board a PHEV to produce small amounts of Hydrogen which is injected into the “range extender” IC engine solely for enhancing the combustion of other fuels (biodiesel, ethanol, etc.) to reduce emissions and boost power is actually a very good idea.
Reply
1-23-2007 @ 6:21PM
Tim said...
Sorry. Paragraph 2, line 1 above should read:
"We all know that Hydrogen is NOT an efficient energy carrier (see above reference)."
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 1:25PM
Robert said...
I think the promise of hydrogen originally (and still) is that hydrogen produces zero carbon, NOx, SOx or POx. It's only byproduct is water. That can't be said for gasoline.
The problem with hydrogen is that you have electrolyze water to get it, and once you do, storage and management is difficult because it is highly combustible.
Compared to a battery, hydrogen may lack efficiency, but the lifecycle is much longer than batteries and batteries have not yet realized their full efficiencies.
So, it is a strategy. Maybe not the best, but a strategy is better than none.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 9:00PM
shmooopy said...
Tim, I agree that hydrogen is not practical but that was not really my point. My point was that this scheme, where you use the battery as a buffer and can use other on-board means to charge the battery has a lot of potential in my opinion. You may argue that it would be better to all be done with batteries, I don't think that scales very well, but time will tell.
In terms of the analysis that you reference. First, its not exactly relevant to the vehicle discussed here given that for everyday driving this car will operate as a battery vehicle. Also, in this case the hyseries would benefit from regenerative breaking. Setting both of those issues aside - I see two additional problems with that analysis:
One, the h2 example is the worst case. If you are generating hydrogen from AC its possible that that can be done at the site where it will be use, thus reducing loss for transportation and potentially having additional efficiencies. Also, h2 might be potentially be generated from DC power directly from a solar panel connection. These are marginal improvements but they do make me think that that analysis a bit of red herring.
Two, is that that analysis leaves out the energy cost of creating and recycling the batteries. I think it would be better to compare system to system, the energy and economic costs. And include more options: all battery, IC, IC/Battery, Fuel Cell with Hydrogen, Fuel Cell with another fuel such as methanol. I think we both agree that the hydrogen fuel cell would lose, but I would argue that a liquid fuel fuel-cell might compare well with a total battery solution in the long run in terms of efficiency, cost, and potential range given a heavier vehicle.
Reply
1-24-2007 @ 9:01PM
shmooopy said...
oops: shmooopy = junkie
Reply
1-25-2007 @ 11:17AM
Sebastian said...
http://www.physorg.com/news85074285.html is not totally right.
1st: there are more efficient (80-90%) ways to make Hydrogen from CH4 (reforming) without energy from a power plant.
2nd: What do they mean with transportlosses and transferlosses? You can only lose hydrogen by leakage and that is very dangerous and will (hopefully) not happen.
3rd: At the moment they only use hydrogen fuel cells they only have a efficiency of 40-50%. But also oxide fuel cells exists which have about 80% efficiency.
Reply
1-25-2007 @ 4:03PM
Tim said...
Sebastian-
1st: CH4 is Methane. CH4 can come from all kinds of rotting waste such as dumps, cows and people, but the vast majority of this comes from “Natural” Gas which, like “Natural” Petroleum and “Natural” Coal is a fossil fuel. So, first you separate the CH4 from the Natural Gas. Then you separate the H2 from the CH4. What happens to the CO2 and other poisonous gases that are released during this process? I know, you pump them back under ground and hope it doesn’t find its way back to the surface. Sounds like how we used to deal with nuclear waste doesn’t it. Good plan if you have lots of Natural Gas to sell.
2nd: Once separated, we still have to (a) compress/liquefy, (b) store it on site in giant containers, (c) transfer it to bulk tankers, (d) transport it, (e) transfer it again into bulk storage containers, (f) transfer it to our vehicles, (g) carry it around in highly pressurized tanks, (h) take the electrons from it in the fuel cells. All this just to run an electric car!! Each step takes energy (efficiency) and each step can and will leak. Hydrogen is one of the smallest and most difficult elements to contain. It’s so small that it can destroy the very metals that it comes in contact with. Free Hydrogen does not occur naturally in large amounts on this planet. Why does nature always lock it up on a hydrocarbon? It is a terrible ozone destroying gas. When released this light gas goes right for the stratosphere and there is no natural way to remove it. Unlike CO2, nothing natural on this planet uses it for “fuel.” What is the overall efficiency of the entire hydrogen energy cycle? Are they (including Al “Green” gore worried about storing and transporting liquefied and/or pressurized explosive gasses like LNG, CNG, H2 as a terror target of opportunity? You Bet!! http://www.lngdanger.com/
3rd: How much do the 80% efficiency fuel cells cost and how long will they last? I bet the Hydrogen/fuel cell cycle can’t compare to the V2G electric http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_to_grid or PHEV cycle using Altairnano style batteries and biodiesel from algae or ethanol from switch grass.
WHERE IS THE INFRASTRUCTURE? WHEN WILL WE HAVE IT? HOW MUCH WILL IT COST? I can plug in my car RIGHT NOW!!!
Reply
1-30-2007 @ 8:14AM
RLTMP said...
What do guys think of the possibility that "Ecotality" may be onto something?
http://www.hydratus.com/
They are creating Hydratus in partnership with the Jet Propulsion Labs, NASA and Caltech.
Reply
1-30-2007 @ 8:20AM
Jennifer said...
The reason they want to use hydrogen is because it is very abundant and the supply is practically endless. In fact it is something that can be produced. That isnt the case with natural fuels. They are mainly looking to replace our crutch on crude oil, not make better efficiency. If they get both in the process, kudos to them.
Reply
1-30-2007 @ 8:33AM
Brett said...
How much does hydrogen cost?
Reply
1-30-2007 @ 8:57AM
marjorie said...
I took the Edge for a test drive. I CANNOT see out of the back window! Visibility was extremely poor and this model is not safe . Looks great, drives ok, but is not for this 5'4" gal.
Reply
1-30-2007 @ 9:14AM
Mr. Mark A. Gatz said...
Looks like the white car near the US Capitol needs a tune-up. lol. http://www.otisfordsucks.com
Reply
1-30-2007 @ 9:16AM
sam said...
i think gas cars will remain at the front of the line for years to come the future is now but hydrogen cars are not
Reply
1-30-2007 @ 9:24AM
Tim said...
Jennifer #14- Before you make a blanket statement like that, I suggest you educate yourself about the “wonders” of Hydrogen. It’s really just Big Oils “red herring” delay to keep us addicted to their primary product until the infrastructure is in place so they can hook us on another one of their products which is “Natural” gas from which Hydrogen is produced. Of course our state and federal governments are helping because if we had electric cars and could produce our own electricity via solar, wind etc, they could loose Billions in tax revenue. If you really enjoy the H2 subject, here is some interesting reading. http://www.oilcrash.com/articles/h2_eco.htm
http://www.oilcrash.com/articles/h_scam.htm.
Reply
1-30-2007 @ 9:40AM
Jan said...
Okay, all you armchair geniuses... how do you spend YOUR spare time when you are not criticizing the efforts of some dedicated citizens who are trying to find alternatives to gasoline-powered vehicles for the average American? Let's see your cutting-edge vehicles on the road! Oh that's right, you only like to complain. That doesn't leave much time to provide actual answers. Keep going, Ford Motor Company!
Reply
1-30-2007 @ 10:03AM
sp said...
Tim, Big business and the gov are after you!!!
Better watch out!! http//Timneedsajob.com
Reply
1-30-2007 @ 10:12AM
Don Mullis said...
Please. Please. Please. No fossil fuels. Absolutely none. A time limited change over to
Electric, Electric, Electric. 5 years? We need it now. We already have the technology. Our engineers can still conquer hydro & other environmental friendly fuels in the meantime. Only different economic directions. We will still spend our mony. Oil companies get on the band wagon or be gone..
Reply