Detroit Auto Show: It's here. GM's plug-in hybrid is the Chevy Volt Concept
Filed under: EV/Plug-in, Hybrid, Chevrolet, AutoblogGreen Exclusive, Detroit Auto Show

For several months now rumors have been rampant about an electric vehicle that General Motors would unveil at the Detroit Auto Show. That vehicle is now real, in the form of the Chevrolet Volt. The Volt is the first vehicle application of the GM's new E-Flex platform. Volt is a C-Class sized four door sedan roughly the size of a Cobalt.
In spite of the presence of an internal combustion engine, GM does not call this vehicle a hybrid. In fact, they consider it an EV with range extending capability. The engine is a turbocharged, 1.0L three cylinder engine with 71 hp that has no mechanical connection to the wheels. The ICE runs at about 1800 rpm and drives a 53 kW generator that charges the lithium ion battery pack. The engine starts and stops automatically as needed to charge the battery.
All the detailed information you've been waiting for on the Volt is after the jump. Click on the photo above of the small images below to enter the high-resolution gallery with 27 pics.
The battery pack provides power to a 161 hp (120 kW) electric motor that's connected to the front wheels to provide the motive force. It's the same motor that's used in the fuel cell Equinox. The LiIon battery has a peak output of 136 kW and a total capacity of 16 kWh. The battery can be charged by plugging it in to any standard 110 V outlet and is fully charged in about 6-6.5 hours. There are two plugs, one on each side of the car, to facilitate home charging.
The Volt has a range of about 40 miles on the battery alone which might not seem like much. But, considering that most people drive fewer miles than that per day, it should mean that a lot of drivers will never use a drop of gas on their daily commute. However, when the fuel tank is filled to it's capacity of 12 US gallons of gas, the Volt has a range of 640 miles. In addition, the Volt ICE is fully flex fuel capable and can run on any combination of gasoline or ethanol up to E85. The power-train is sized to achieve 0-60 mph acceleration of about 8.5 seconds.
The styling of the Volt is intended to give aesthetically pleasing proportions, with short overhangs and a sporty look. With the small motor sitting low between the front wheels and ICE sitting above and behind that, there is virtually nothing mechanical extending ahead the wheels. That leaves just the front bumper and radiator sitting there and the body almost shrink wrapped around the cooling system and wheels. The short overhang and front mid-engine layout give the impression of a classical sporty long hood appearance even on a relatively short car.
The roofline of the car is cut low, giving a tiny slit of a windshield, but the innovative door glass treatment helps avoid the sitting in a bathtub feeling of cars like the Chrysler Crossfire or Audi TT. The sides of the Volt have a definite shoulder, flowing out from the base of the windows and the down the sides. The windows themselves are relatively short, but the top part of the outer door skin including the shoulder is glass, allowing for and airy feel and much better visibility. Whether this look is practical for production is debatable, but it sure looks unique. The wheel wells bulge out over the tires which combined with the almost non-existent overhangs gives a powerful, aggressive stance.
The Volt has a lot of nice looking details like the shiny trim panels on the trailing edge of each of the front fenders which open to expose the standard 110V plugs, leaving behind the inductive charging padels of the EV1. The door handles are hidden in the chrome trim strips along the lower edge of the shoulder glass on the doors. Based on the CG images available at the time of writing it looks like there is also glass in the back panel below the tail-lights. Actual evaluation of visibility will have to wait until GM shows us the actual car at the show.
GM's goal was to create an electric car that would not force users to plan their travel around the next charging session, while still providing all the capabilities of a standard four door, standard compact car and produce it in quantities of 100,000+ per year. They seem to have succeeded at the first part of this. Now the big question is when can we buy one? Here things get decidedly murky.
In GM's development process, a program isn't considered a real production intent vehicle until a vehicle line executive is assigned. The Volt has a VLE in the person of Tony Posawatz, so it is intended for showrooms, not just the show circuit. The only thing that isn't quite real at this point is the timing. The hold-up is that darned battery. At this point no car-maker in the world has yet publicly committed to building a car powered by Li-ion batteries in any significant quantities (Tesla has announced plans, but until they actual start delivering soem production roadsters, I'll withhold judgement). Regardless of the claims of battery makers, the technology to build an affordable battery that will last 100,000 miles, with minimal degradation of performance has yet to be demonstrated. GM is looking at a number of potential suppliers, but so far hasn't committed to any. No pricing is available at this point, but the base price is almost certain to be more than a comparable Cobalt or Focus. However, they want to price it so that total operating cost of the vehicle and fuel costs are comparable or less than current cars. Given, the efficiency of such a vehicle that should allow quite a bit of latitude, as long as customers buy into that concept.
The car on show here in Detroit is a runner, and hopefully GM will let AutoblogGreen behind the wheel before too long. GM made sure to emphasize that the Volt and E-Flex are not science fair projects or PR stunts. For the sake of GM and the domestic industry as a whole, they better bring something like this to market sooner rather than later.
Read all about the E-Flex system here and see a comparison of the Volt to the EV1 here.UPDATE: All of the Volt's specifications can be found here.
LATER UPDATE: We now have pictures of the Volt from the NAIAS floor, including the interior of the vehicle. Click here to see them.
EVEN LATER UPDATES: "Who Killed The Electric Car?" director Chris Paine and Plug-in America founder Paul Scott speak out on the Volt. Also, GM's Dave Barthmuss talks to AutoblogGreen about the Chevy Volt
The following is GM's press release on the Volt:
Chevrolet Volt - GM's Concept Electric Vehicle - Could Nearly Eliminate Trips to the Gas Station
DETROIT, January 7/PRNewswire/ --
The Chevrolet Volt concept sedan, powered by the E-flex System - GM's next-generation electric propulsion system - and sporting an aggressive, athletic design, could nearly eliminate trips to the gas station.
The Chevrolet Volt is a battery-powered, four-passenger electric vehicle that uses a gas engine to create additional electricity to extend its range. The Volt draws from GM's previous experience in starting the modern electric vehicle market when it launched the EV1 in 1996, according to GM Vice Chairman Robert A. Lutz.
"The EV1 was the benchmark in battery technology and was a tremendous achievement," Lutz said. "Even so, electric vehicles, in general, had limitations. They had limited range, limited room for passengers or luggage, couldn't climb a hill or run the air conditioning without depleting the battery, and had no device to get you home when the battery's charge ran low.
"The Chevrolet Volt is a new type of electric vehicle. It addresses the range problem and has room for passengers and their stuff. You can climb a hill or turn on the air conditioning and not worry about it."
The Volt can be fully charged by plugging it into a 110-volt outlet for approximately six hours a day. When the lithium-ion battery is fully charged, the Volt can deliver more than 60 city kilometers of pure electric vehicle range. When the battery is depleted, a 1.0-liter, three-cylinder turbocharged engine spins at a constant speed, or revolutions per minute (rpm), to create electricity and replenish the battery. According to Lutz, this increases the fuel economy and range.
"If you lived within 50 km from work (100 km round trip) and charged your vehicle every night when you came home or during the day at work, you would get fuel consumption of 1.6 liters per 100 km," Lutz said. "More than half of all Americans live within around 30 km of where they work (60 km round trip). In that case, you might never burn a drop of gas during the life of the car."
In the event a driver forgets to charge the vehicle or goes on a vacation far away, the Volt would still get 4.7 l/100 km by using the engine to convert gasoline into electricity and extending its range up to 1030 km, more than double that of today's conventional vehicles. In addition, the Chevrolet Volt is designed to run on E85, a fuel blend of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline.
A technological breakthrough required to make this concept a reality is a large lithium-ion battery. This type of electric car, which the technical community calls an "EV range-extender," would require a battery pack that weighs nearly 400 pounds (181 kg). Some experts predict that such a battery - or a similar battery - could be production-ready by 2010 to 2012.
Jon Lauckner, GM vice president of Global Program Management, said the Volt
is uniquely built to accommodate a number of advanced technology propulsion solutions that can give GM a competitive advantage.
"Today's vehicles were designed around mechanical propulsion systems that use petroleum as their primary source of fuel." Lauckner said. Tomorrow's vehicles need to be developed around a new propulsion architecture with electricity in mind. The Volt is the first vehicle designed around GM's E-flex System.
"That's why we are also showing a variant of the Chevrolet Volt with a hydrogen-powered fuel cell, instead of a gasoline engine EV range-extender," said Lauckner. "Or, you might have a diesel engine driving the generator to create electricity, using bio-diesel. Finally, an engine using 100-percent ethanol might be factored into the mix. The point is, all of these alternatives are possible with the E-Flex System."
The Volt concept car is built on a modified future architecture, Lauckner said, similar to the one GM uses for current small cars, such as the Chevrolet Cobalt and HHR.
According to Larry Burns, GM vice president for research and development and strategic planning, the world's growing demand for energy and its dependence on oil for transportation is the common theme behind today's headlines.
"Whether your concern is energy security, global climate change, natural disasters, the high price of gas, the volatile pricing of a barrel of oil and the effect that unpredictability has on Wall Street - all of these issues point to a need for energy diversity," said Burns. "Today, there are more than 800 million cars and trucks in the world. In 15 years, that will grow to 1.1 billion vehicles. We can't continue to be 98-percent dependent on oil to meet our transportation needs. Something has to give. We think the Chevrolet Volt helps bring about the diversity that is needed. If electricity met only 10 percent of the world's transportation needs, the impact would be huge."
GM's E-flex System moves automobile toward new electric age
GM's E-flex System enables multiple propulsion systems to fit into a common chassis, using electric drive to help the world diversify energy sources and establish electricity from the grid as one of those sources.
"The DNA of the automobile has not changed in more than 100 years," said Burns. "Vehicles still operate in pretty much the same fashion as when Karl Benz introduced the 'horseless carriage' in 1886.
"While mechanical propulsion will be with us for many decades to come, GM sees a market for various forms of electric vehicles, including fuel cells and electric vehicles using gas and diesel engines to extend the range. With our new E-flex concept, we can produce electricity from gasoline, ethanol, bio-diesel or hydrogen.
"We can tailor the propulsion to meet the specific needs and infrastructure of a given market. For example, somebody in Brazil might use 100-percent ethanol (E100)
to power an engine generator and battery. A customer in Shanghai might get hydrogen from the sun and create electricity in a fuel cell. Meanwhile, a customer in Sweden might use wood to create bio-diesel."
The Chevrolet Volt is just the first variant of the E-flex System. The Volt uses a large battery and a small, 1.0-liter turbocharged gasoline engine to produce enough electricity to go up to 1030 km and provide triple-digit fuel economy. GM will show other variations of the propulsion systems at future auto shows.
"GM is building a fuel cell variant that mirrors the propulsion system in the Chevrolet Sequel (fuel cell concept)," Burns said. "Instead of a big battery and a small engine generator used in the Volt, we would use a fuel cell propulsion system with a small battery to capture energy when the vehicle brakes. Because the Volt is so small and lightweight, we would need only about half of the hydrogen storage as the Sequel to get around 480 km of range."
Future concepts might incorporate diesel generators, bio-diesel and E-100.
Environmentally conscious vehicles can be aesthetically appealing
With exterior proportions associated more with classic sports cars, the Chevrolet Volt conveys an immediate message of agility and sophistication. Twenty-one-inch wheels and sheer, taut surface relationships reiterate the statement. The Volt's athletic design challenges the notion that an environmentally conscious vehicle can't be beautiful and possess an aesthetic spirit that matches its driving characteristics.
"We leveraged our resources around the globe to develop the design aesthetic for the Volt," said Ed Welburn, vice president, GM Global Design. "It was important that the design capture the face of the Chevrolet as it's recognized around the world."
True to the heritage of its Chevrolet bowtie, the Volt's exterior design suggests spirited performance and is wrapped in a stylish package, with classic Chevrolet performance cues that hint at both Camaro and Corvette. On the inside, near-term technologies and innovative materials combine with ingenious use of ambient light for an interior environment that's light, airy and thoughtful.
"First and foremost, this is an advanced technology vehicle that uses little to no fuel at all. But we didn't see any reason why that should compromise its design," said Anne Asensio, executive director, GM Design. Asensio led the design team that created the Volt concept, with designs solicited from GM's studios around the world.
"We wanted a size that connected with everyone, so we designed a small car," said Asensio. "In the end, the interior design team from England inspired the final interior execution, and the exterior is the work of the Michigan advanced design team.
"Our job was to design a vehicle people could easily imagine," said Asensio. "It couldn't be a 'science project,' because that's not what this car is all about. It had to be realistic, executable and carry the essence of the Chevrolet brand."
Source: General Motors (GM Europe)












Reader Comments (Page 2 of 13)
1-07-2007 @ 2:33PM
Turbofrog said...
That is a genuinely desirable car. If you build it, they will come. No doubt about it.
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 2:51PM
Lee Colleton said...
Jeff Garzik: Why would I keep 100 pounds of gas in the car when you're making a 40 mile round trip to work? I would keep the needle a gallon above the warning light for efficiencies sake (and carry a cell phone & gas can). Then again, I live in Seattle and finding a gas station isn't an issue on my way to work.
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 2:53PM
Gregory Propf said...
This concept has been in use for decades in the railroad industry in the form of the so-called diesel-electric locomotive. You have a diesel engine driving a generator and an electric motor driving the wheels. This allows the diesel to be run at peak efficiency all the time. I often wondered when someone would adapt the idea to cars since it is mechanically a lot simpler than the current hybids where the ICE is still connected to the drivetrain. Bravo to GM for this. Now if they would just junk their SUV line and spend all that money developing *this* instead!
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 3:04PM
Conor said...
except for the mini brakes, i want one and i want it now!
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 3:24PM
Chris Barron said...
In terms of emissions, for the same number of miles an electric car produces between 1/2 to 1/4 of the emissions at the power station that an petrol powered car emits from it's exhaust over the same mileage. A benefit to producing all emissions in one place (the power station) is that it becomes much easier to trap them and stop them reaching the atmosphere.
In the UK, it costs about 1p to 1.5p per mile to run an electric car, and about 14p per mile to run a petrol car.
The maintenance of an electric vehicle is simpler, quicker and much cheaper than a petrol or diesel car.
I have the maths to back up my comments should anyone want to view them. They are based on an energy consumption of 0.2kWh/mile.
A domestic iron of 1400W power, run for 1 hour uses 1.4kWh, or, enough to drive an electric car 7 miles.
The impact on the grid will be very minimal, and the grid has a huge spare capcity, both in the UK and the US.
http://tinyurl.com/y9webh or http://www.pnl.gov/news/release.asp?id=204 for PNNL study about the impact of PHEV's
This is definately the way forward, I don't care what the oil companies do with themselves afterwards either, they didn't care about what I was going to do when they put the price of oil up !
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 6:07PM
Simon said...
It's just replacing one form of CO2 emission with another; the more PHEVs are sold, the higher the demand on the power plants, and the more coal they will burn. Likewise, E85 is both net energy negative and net C)2 negative, so that pumps out even more CO2 than just using gasoline. Really, replacing the majority of coal plants with fission reactors would be the only way to have a truly low-emission vehicle...
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 6:13PM
LaughingTooHard said...
Enlightened(?)
Which American products are you sampling? A 1980's Escort? A 1970 Nova? A 1990's Oldsmobile? Even the critics (as on the Japanese maker dole as they are) find that the gap is much smaller than it used to be. Their biggest complaints center around interior materials tacticle feel and percived quality. Now if you were a Green Consumer you would know the Japanese are notorius for using suppliers, that while make a more "touchy-feely" plastic, are more than likely making it at an environmental impact vs price. Or using underpaid labor, poltically unstable countries, ect, ect.
American automakers are held to a much higher standard since we have laws here. The Japanese still hunt whales and disregard all UN regulations on fishing. I think some country put a few 30mm holes in a Japanese fishing boat to make their point. And you still like their cars, huh?
I also amd sure you missed my whole economic point of if:
GM, BMW, Mercedes or Ford uses:
X(Design)+Y(Research)+Z(Production) to make a product
and the Japanese use:
S(Reverse Engineer)+R(Refine)+Z(Prodcution) which formula is cheaper and results in a better product? And which formula is without "honor"?
I agree that the Japanese are great at making a (seemingly) better copy but they excel at making the American people "feel" like it is better even the differences are negligible. And that is not the defination of "Enlightened"
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 6:20PM
Michael said...
What about the life span of LiIon batteries? My understanding is that each year 20% of the battery capacity is lost.
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 8:14PM
Engineer-Poet said...
This would be great, if it wasn't a case of GM copying what CalCars and EDrive Systems are already doing with Priuses.
There was a time I expected leadership from Detroit. Working for them fifteen years ago, I learned not to expect so much.
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 9:09PM
Geo. B said...
I can already see the solar power tweaks coming
down the pike. Put a pretty panel on the roof for
The extra distance to home !
Excellent !
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 9:31PM
LaughingTooHard said...
Engineer,
Who copied who? Sounds like an evolutionary step no? I would tend to think GM started on this path a bit before any garage-start up seeing as it takes them a bit longer.
For the record CalCar/Edrive says they have a whopping 3 prototypes with two models with a 10 mile range and a 30 mile range. Oh at a top speed of 35mph. Try going 35mph on my commute and you might get shot. Cost to you? $25K for the Prius and $10 for the conversion. According to PopSci's math that would put the time to recover the investment at over 200,000 miles of driving. Gosh that sounds like a great deal!
And the Prius is not anything like this car, modded or not. This is a whole car designed around zero gasoline use. To me it looks like the GM skateboard platfrom is coming into reality. The Prius is an adult ADD pacifier and a less than honest one at that. Try and get a warranty or get CalCar's/EDrive work past the DMV. I am pretty sure you'd waste a good amount of time. Any hack can rip apart a car and make it electric, but that isn't safe, legal or sane is it? I can get 40mpg in my 240bhp Impala but who wants to drive that way? Not anyone I know.
Any homebuilt project is 5% sweat 10% kludge and 85% PR spin. Give me one of those cars and I am sure the owner would cringe as the numbers just don't add up in normal driving. CalCar and EDrive just want to make money - unless they went non-profit in last 5 minutes...
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 9:58PM
Markus Strobl said...
This will be a hard sell... It will cost less to operate if you disconnect the battery and run on gas!
From the specs: 12 gallons of fuel gives you 640 miles = 53 mpg. Cost per mile at $2.25/gallon = 4.2 cents.
Running on electricity you get 40 miles from 16 KWh. I pay $0.12/KWh so that's $1.92 for 40 miles. Cost per mile = 4.8 cents!
It would still be interesting due to environmental impact if most power plants weren't burning coal & natural gas. With the efficiency loss of power generation and transport I doubt carbon emissions are lower with the electric drive.
I love the idea and would really like to eliminate our oil dependency, but this doesn't make much sense???
Reply
1-07-2007 @ 10:50PM
Davin said...
That CO2 not created by driving will almost certainly be counteracted by increased powerplant emissions. Still, a step in the right direction.
Reply
1-08-2007 @ 12:46AM
AMK29J said...
"That same example would also save 4.4 metric tonnes of CO2 every year from each car." Did you take into the account the metric tonnes of CO2 it's going to be using by charging using coal power? Coal generates 54% of the U.S.'s electricity... Sure it's not expensive gas, but it's still polluting.
Reply
1-08-2007 @ 1:56AM
John Ho said...
One of the pictures of the mechanicals has the ecotech replaced with a fuel cell. It looks like they have various alternative drive trains for the platform.
Reply
1-08-2007 @ 3:21AM
Paul Swift said...
I think this is revolutionary. I imagine parking lots set up with spaces doing solar panelled umbrellas to charge it--pull your Volt in under the umbrella, plug in, and you're getting a free charge and extension on your green mileage. Trip to the store gets you two more miles. Government subsidies for these, of course, but once up they cost almost nothing. College campuses should be crawling for these parking solar-pumps with hip-minded professors, and students who have more money, getting free choice parking and the use of solar energy. We need to set an example that rewards environmental consciousness!
I love the trunk as integrated to the whole inner space. Everything's just an arm's reach away for those in the back. Why did we separate all this in the first place anyway?
My concern is with the all-glass top, though I LOVE it, especially the side windows and the trunk. But, these seem like a FURNACE in the summer to me. Are they going to provide some kind of indoor curtain to cover it all up when you get out in the 90 degree weather (30s for you Celsius guys). You don't want to start it up ten minutes before you leave and crank the AC just so you can get in and drive away.
Make it, make it compatible with the iPod, the Zune if you must. If we're really looking at 2010 for earliest release date perhaps some sort of computer integration (and be savvy and let in Macs, Unix and Linux, PLEASE! Windows is on its way out anyway--and besides, we're all using intel now, anyway, yeah? Should be easy). Hands free cellphone compatibility would be nice (and would probably prevent some accidents)--though, with the supposed coming of the iPhone perhaps we're gonna kill two birds with one stone here.
Make it for under $25,000 and you would destroy your competition (and perhaps take away from some of your other lines--but you must know this, it's bound to happen sooner or later, might as well be progressive). But be revolutionary about it, darnit. Make it a part of our modern life, with all our gadgets and all. This should be the center for your marketing stratgegy--take a page from Apple's iPod success. You're selling a lifestyle here, a hip, green moderness.
I love it. With the increased use of solar/wind/hydro at home this presents an opportunity to DRAMATICALLY reduce our ecological impact and should get standing ovations and medals of merit.
Full steam (er, ummm, electricity) ahead!
Reply
1-08-2007 @ 7:51AM
Goos said...
This car would be the car of the next decades, when the oil prices will go up and up, as the oil reserves are depleted. If GM is capable of making this kind of vehicles comercially available by 2009, then the japanese domination of global auto market is over.
This would be a turning point in the history of the automobile.
Reply
1-08-2007 @ 8:32AM
Jimmy said...
#27 Simon, the majority of scientific studies have found that corn based ethanol as currently produced in the US has a reduction in CO2 emissions versus petroleum derived gasoline fuel. You should also note that the principal anti-ethanol "scientist" who is in the minority on this topic is funded by the petroleum industry.
The "volt" concept is a fabulous combination of flex fuel and plugin hybrid technology.
Reply
1-08-2007 @ 8:58AM
Owain Ozymandias Buck said...
There's a wonderful discussion going on here, and I'm afraid anything I add will be redundant. So I'm sorry, but I have to add this:
Am I the only one who now sees an excuse for digging out an old AC/DC sticker to slap on this thing if I get one???
Reply
1-08-2007 @ 11:04AM
Wayne Doering said...
The BIG THREE are far from going down the tubes as many people thought.
With GMC taking first class place in the Detroit International Auto Show and Ford on their heels, the turnaround is here to stay. Congratulations to the best USA auto design Engineers in the world.
Reply